Search

Divestment Works: From Apartheid to Climate Change

3P Author ID
100
Primary Category
Content

Editor’s Note: This article originally appeared in the Feb. 25 issue of Green Money Journal

By Timothy Smith

The Episcopal Church made history in 1971 when it filed the first shareholder resolution by a religious organization. The company in question was General Motors, and the resolution called on the company to withdraw its business in South Africa. It was both church history and business history.

Religious organizations had publicly spoken out against South Africa’s repressive system of white supremacy before, but this was the first time that a religious organization had utilized the power of its stock portfolio to raise an issue for a vote by investors. While it was a front-page New York Times story, shareholder support was unenthusiastic, coming in at around 3 percent voting support. But in that moment, a new tool was created to present social and environmental issues to a company’s board and top management.

The Episcopal Church’s witness was quickly adopted by a number of other Protestant denominations including United Church of Christ, American Baptist Church, Presbyterian Church, United Methodist Church, Disciples of Christ and National Council of Churches, followed by Roman Catholic organizations. From a few dozen religious investors in the 1970s, today more than 300 religious organizations are part of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR) with member assets of over $100 billion.

But that was still to come in the 1970s. At that time, a new era was emerging as businesses were engaged by investors who championed a concern for ethics and corporate responsibility along with a search for shareholder value.

As one might imagine, the earliest company responses countered that church representatives didn’t understand business, and that a bank couldn’t decide on a loan nor could a company make decisions on where to invest using social or ethical criteria. Within a few short years, however, major banks announced they were ending loans to the South African government because of apartheid. Chase Manhattan, led by David Rockefeller, announced it wouldn’t continue loans to the South African government since the bank didn’t want its funds supporting government-sanctioned racism.

The anti-apartheid campaigns had a number of notable and complementary component parts: The religious community, shareholder resolutions, universities, foundations, boycotts of company products and demonstrations, and Congress acted as well. The full article expands on each of these.

Are there lessons here for the vigorous debate occurring today on investments and climate change? Absolutely and here are a few of those...

Read the full article here

Timothy Smith is Senior Vice President and Director of ESG Shareholder Engagement for Walden Asset Management.

3P ID
210289
Prime
Off

Low carbon technologies could fuel 'cold economy' boom

Primary Category
Content

The demand for cooling in everything from supermarkets and medicines to data centres could boom to create huge growth in the "cold economy" in the coming years, a new report from the Carbon Trust maintains.

David Sanders, director, innovation at the Carbon Trust, said: “Turning the Cold Economy from an idea into reality will depend on joined-up thinking and collaboration by industry, academia and government to develop, test and deploy novel solutions. With Britain’s rich history of innovation and engineering, we have a real opportunity to lead the way in low carbon cold technologies and drive innovative solutions from the lab to the market.”

According to the Trust's report, The Emerging Cold Economy, by 2030 global power demand for cooling could grow by the equivalent of three times the current electricity capacity of the UK. At the same time, it points out, vast amounts of cold are wasted. It cites the re-gasification of LNG at import terminals as an example. This could potentially be recycled to reduce the cost and environmental impact of cooling in both buildings and vehicles.

Access the full report here

 

 

Picture credit: © Martinapplegate | Dreamstime.com - Girl Buying Cakes In Supermarket Photo
 

Prime
Off
Newsletter Sent
Off

Oscar winner Jared Leto becomes WWF ambassador

Primary Category
Content

Award-winning actor, musician and director Jared Leto has taken on a new role...this time as a WWF Global Ambassador.

Leto (pictured above) recently travelled to South Africa with WWF to learn first-hand about the rhino poaching crisis and WWF’s efforts to save rhino populations across Africa and Asia.
 
“Being that close to majestic creatures like rhinos and elephants reminds me of the deep connection and important responsibility we have to protect and shepherd these fragile species and their habitats," commented Leto.

"I’m committed and passionate about doing all I can to help ensure that these endangered animals survive, and will continue to encourage others to get into action as well. We must join together and protect these powerful yet extremely vulnerable animals from all the senseless slaughter and double our efforts to restore their populations across Africa and Asia. It can and – with a focused global effort – will be done."

 

Picture credit: © WWF-US/Jennafer Bonello (Jared Leto with four members of the Rhino Protection Unit accepting postcards from children in the United States with written words of thanks for protecting endangered species)

Prime
Off
Newsletter Sent
Off

Galapagos: Anatomy of an EcoCruise

3P Author ID
91
Primary Category
Content

The definition of "eco-tourism" is hard to nail down. If forced to, I'd probably say something like: Eco tourism is any travel whose primary purpose is the enjoyment of nature in its wild state and upon which special effort has been made to minimize negative externalities - and maximize the positive ones.  

As such, anything from a camping trip to the local state park to an elaborate international adventure would probably qualify.  In terms of grander trips, the Galapagos is probably one of the more well known eco-tourism destinations. So what are the basic ways tour companies are minimizing impact? And how are they going above and beyond?

Strict Rules Imposed

Galapagos National Park, which controls 97% of the islands, enacts strict regulations concerning where people can go, what they can do, and how many people can turn up in an one spot. Even prior to boarding the plane, travellers' luggage is screened for organic material that might worsen the islands' invasive species problem and once airborne, a pesticide is sprayed in the plane to finish any invaders off (don't ask me what this does to people).

A limited number of overnight boats are allowed to operate and each boat is equipped with a tracking device so that authorities can verify exactly who is going where at any given time. As such, tour companies are very much under the eye of park authorities and their plans and activities are largely not under their direct control. This makes for a situation where compliance with rules is a constant pressure and is very strictly abided by. The crew of our boat shared with me not only their lengthy books of regulations and guidelines but also a universal enthusiasm for the need for such rules. The general consensus seemed to be that the rules were there for good reasons and if anything needed to be tighter, not looser despite the business challenges such compliance might pose. The result, in my opinion is that guests are left with a sense of respect that they can take home with them and apply when traveling in protected areas in the future.

I wish I could say that all the boats were powered by solar energy or something fanciful along those lines, but it's just not a realistic option.  That said, waste is recycled and organic matter is discharged at sea in deep water.

Thinking Economics

Beyond the strictly environmental, challenges do remain. Specifically, the self-contained nature of cruising means relatively little money is spent by travelers directly into the local economy. The National Park remains well funded but the 3% of the islands with an ever growing population of humans has challenges and insufficient employment. In conversing about this issue, some suggest that tourism should be less restricted in populated areas to allow hotels to fill to to allow day trips in smaller boats operated directly by locals.

The central Equadorian government has put pressure on the Galapagos to allow for hotel development and this day-trip concept, which would also be far more affordable for tourists (the overnight boats tend to be on the luxury end).  However, the issue of water supply alone may be enough to make such development very limited regardless of any other debate.

Ed Note: Accommodations, travel and guidance in the Galapagos were courtesy of EcoVentura, which runs 7-night cruising expeditions around the islands.  

3P ID
210058
Prime
Off

Volkswagen Exec: We Need More Federal Investment in Electric Vehicles

3P Author ID
8779
Primary Category
Content

A top Volkswagen executive had bold words for Washington at the 2015 Electric Drive Congress seminar on Tuesday.

During his presentation, Jörg Sommer, Volkswagen's VP of product marketing and strategy, said the company believes continued legislative support is needed to reach the next level of electric vehicle adoption.

"Automakers have effectively delivered electric vehicles that can satisfy the needs of most American drivers,” Sommer said this week in Washington, D.C. “In addition to the investment we and other companies and industries are making, we would like to see federal financing support for establishing fast-charging networks in urban areas and interstate corridors."

Sommer's statements come on the heels of Volkswagen's announcement that it will partner with BMW and ChargePoint to create express-charging corridors on the East and West coasts.

Sommer went on to add a dollar figure to that commitment: The company will invest $10 million in the EV infrastructure initiative, which will add 100 fast-charging stations to both coasts by the end of this year. The company will also invest to support the installation of charging stations in certain dealer locations.

To facilitate local, state and regional infrastructure deployment, Sommer suggested that regulators will also need to support programs that reinforce these efforts to make mass EV adoption a reality, including the Department of Energy’s Clean Cities program and the Department of Transportation’s MAP-21 program. But he also noted that more investment is needed beyond these programs, saying: “We need further congressional support with the mid-term review of the EPA’s greenhouse gas regulation to extend the multiplier credits for plug-in vehicles beyond [model year 2021 vehicles].” (For background on what's to be expected in the upcoming mid-year review, check out this industry brief from Resources for the Future.)

Additionally, Sommer suggested that state and federal governments could also lead the way by adopting electric vehicles for their own fleets:

"We’d like to see more state and federal organizations commit to cleaner fleets by purchasing EVs and [plug-in hybrids]. This should be a U.S. government priority, and federal purchasing guidelines should reflect that by giving fleet purchasers the flexibility they need."

Sommer is surely on to something here: Including the military, the U.S. government operates more than 600,000 cars, buses, SUVs, ambulances, and light-, medium- and heavy-duty trucks. A footprint of that size means great potential to spur shifts in the market.

This fact isn't lost on President Barack Obama, who noted these figures in a 2009 executive order that effectively kicked off the government's first Electric Vehicle Pilot Program.

Launched in 2010, the program leased 116 plug-in EVs to 20 federal agencies and called for a 10 percent increase in alternative fuels (including electricity) every year until 2015. However, despite some impressive moves from the postal service, fleet electrification has been slow.

We've already seen the impacts that small shifts can have when rolled out across an entity as far-reaching as the federal government: Back in 2013, the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy estimated that energy efficiency programs could save the U.S. economy $1 trillion by 2030.

For Volkswagen's part, it will continue to invest in EV adoption in the U.S. and abroad: In addition to the company's EV charging initiative, it will partner with SunPower to offer e-Golf owners “premier access” to SunPower’s upcoming home solar energy storage solution. The company also turned heads in October when it announced it will roll out more than 20 electric vehicles in China over the next few years. The move may signal what's to come for Volkswagen in the European and North American markets as well, a company rep told TriplePundit after the announcement.

"While we aren't able to provide specifics, VW is looking at other plug-in offerings for both Europe and North America," said Darryl Harrison, Volkswagen's manager for brand communications for the West. "Those offerings include [plug-in electric vehicles], EVs and other e-mobility solutions."

Volkswagen isn't the only automaker doubling down on electric vehicles: At the North American International Auto Show (NAIAS), Chevrolet unveiled its Bolt EV -- which, with 200 miles of electric range at a $30,000 price after federal tax incentives, has the potential to push EVs into the mainstream. And, of course, Tesla announced last year that it would open-source its technology to boost EV market share.

So, will the federal government follow suit? Only time will tell, but a push from top automakers can only help.

Image courtesy of Volkswagen

Mary Mazzoni is the Senior Editor of TriplePundit. You can follow her on Twitter @mary_mazzoni

3P ID
210201
Prime
Off

3p Weekend: 7 Brands We're Crushing On this Valentine's Day

3P Author ID
8779
Primary Category
Content

With a busy week behind you and the weekend within reach, there’s no shame in taking things a bit easy on Friday afternoon. With this in mind, every Friday TriplePundit will give you a fun, easy read on a topic you care about. So, take a break from those endless email threads, and spend five minutes catching up on the latest trends in sustainability and business.

When it comes to corporate responsibility, far too many major brands are like a bad boyfriend: Sure, their claims sound great at first, but it doesn't take much follow-up before their true colors come out, leaving you disappointed and in desperate need of a rebound.

But hey, Valentine's Day is just around the corner, and no one wants to hear those stories. To celebrate this day of love, this week we're tipping our hats to seven brand crushes that have never let us down.

1. Method

Method is one of those brands you just have to love. The company launched in 2001 with a few natural home cleaning sprays. By the following year, its products were on the shelves in Target stores nationwide. In 2009, Method became one of the first Cradle to Cradle endorsed companies, with 37 C2C certified products at launch, among the most of any company in the world (now up to 60 certified products and counting). In 2012, it rocked the packaged goods industry again by creating soap bottle packaging made almost entirely from recovered ocean trash.

Method hopes its new factory on the South Side of Chicago will be the first LEED Platinum certified factory in the consumer packaged goods industry. The company already revealed plans for the largest rooftop farm in the world atop its factory, which will produce up to 1 million pounds of produce each year. The fact that Method never overtly claims to be "green" only makes us love them more.

2. Unilever


In our opinion, Unilever's CEO Paul Polman is enough reason for the company to make our list. In a 2014 survey, Unilever annihilated the competition in sustainability leadership, largely thanks to the "striking" emotional appeal of its CEO. When investors criticized the company for spending its time on social good programs in the developing world, rather than maximizing shareholder returns by all means necessary, Polman famously retorted, "If you don’t like it, go somewhere else."

And, in what is an unfortunately rare occurrence, Unilever's business practices match up its sustainably-minded CEO: In rankings that lambast other companies for falling short, Unilever consistently earns top brass as one of few exceptions. (Seriously, take your pick: deforestation, palm oil practices, carbon emissions, the list goes on and on.) If that isn't enough to make you swoon, the company is also well on its way to sending zero waste to landfill, and it struck a five-year global agreement with a U.N. agency that aims to better train and connect smallholder farmers to the marketplace.

3. Chipotle


Far ahead of the pack, Chipotle has been focusing on sustainable sourcing since 2008. The company has gradually increased its sustainable sourcing practices, starting with hormone- and antibiotic-free meats and building up to local produce sourcing. Along the way, it captured hearts and minds with cause marketing ads that shed light on factory farming and sustainable agriculture.

And it's not one of those brand crushes that bails when the going gets tough: This year the fast-casual chain demonstrated its commitment to sustainable sourcing by cutting out pork at more than a third of its restaurants after a supplier failed to meet company standards. The company doubled down on its position during its earnings call this month, which was basically a business case for sustainable sourcing.

4. Patagonia


Ah, Patagonia: Just like that high school crush who still makes your heart skip when you see her at holiday parties. This Ventura, California-based clothing company has been around for more than 40 years, and it has been serious about sustainability from the start.

With that much history, it's tough to describe all the reasons we love Patagonia, but here are some standouts: The company has been making fleece from repurposed plastics since 1993. It later debuted a plant-based wetsuit and even went fair trade. Patagonia also consistently irks other companies (and makes us jump for joy) around Black Friday: Its "Don't Buy This Jacket" campaign, and similar initiatives that target reduced consumption, urge consumers to think twice before buying. Wow, there's a novel idea.

5. New Belgium Brewing Co.


From offering exemplary bike-to-work incentives to giving struggling downtowns an economic boost, we’ve tipped our hats to New Belgium Brewing a few times already in our 3p Weekend posts.

But these aren't the only ways New Belgium embraces sustainability: Back in 2010, TriplePundit readers voted then co-CEOs, Jeff Lebesch and Kim Jordan, as some of the most sustainably-minded in the country. (Jordan still serves as CEO of the company.) New Belgium also made its way onto our top 10 sustainable breweries list, is 100 percent employee-owned and was one of only six companies recognized in a recent study for taking responsibility for its packaging.

6. Seventh Generation


Established in 1988, this Burlington, Vermont-based brand remains an independent, privately-held company. It was one of the first to bring natural cleaning products to the mass market, and it remains one of the biggest names out there when it comes to cleaning your home without harsh chemicals.

Not one to rest on its laurels, Seventh Generation continues to be vocal about chemicals reform outside its own walls -- from leading the Companies for Safer Chemicals coalition to becoming one of the largest donors to the Whole Planet Foundation, which seeks to provide micro-financing for sustainable development projects in Latin America, Africa and Asia.

7. Tesla Motors


With the launch of the Roadster in 2008, Tesla Motors effectively catapulted electric vehicles into the mainstream. Although the cost was far out of reach for most drivers, the long-range electric sports car was the first to earn the attention of tried-and-true car junkies -- proving, at long last, that EVs weren't just for "tree-hugging hippies." Even then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger weighed in, famously calling the Roadster a "sexy car."

The automaker's growth was swift and dominant: In 2013, it paid off a $451.8 million load from the Department of Energy -- nine years before it was due. Tesla has now set its sights on bigger things -- like its planned "Gigafactory," that will produce batteries for both vehicles and energy storage, and its decision to open-source its coveted technology to the entire auto industry. We're still waiting on that lower-priced model though, guys.

Did we miss your favorite brand? Tell us about it in the comments section! 

Image courtesy of Method

Mary Mazzoni is the Senior Editor of TriplePundit. You can follow her on Twitter @mary_mazzoni

3P ID
210256
Prime
Off

Apple Invests $3 Billion in Solar Energy

3P Author ID
138
Primary Category
Content

Apple is going all-in on solar energy, to the tune of nearly $3 billion for solar facilities in California and Arizona.

First, the company this week said it will partner with First Solar on a 2,900-acre solar farm in Monterey County, California. Apple has committed $848 million for clean energy from the California Flats solar farm, First Solar said in a press release.

The company will receive electricity from 130 megawatts of the solar project under a 25-year power purchase agreement, which First Solar called "the largest agreement in the industry to provide clean energy to a commercial end user." Project construction will begin later this year, and completion is scheduled for the end of 2016.

Apple CEO Tim Cook said the First Solar project will produce enough power for the company's headquarters, all of its retail stores in California and many other facilities. “We know that climate change is real,” he said at the Goldman Sachs technology conference in San Francisco on Tuesday. “Our view is that the time for talk has passed, and the time for action is now. We’ve shown that with what we’ve done.” 

"Apple's commitment was instrumental in making this project possible and will significantly increase the supply of solar power in California," said Joe Kishkill, chief commercial officer for First Solar.

Apple is also making a big renewable energy splash involving its data centers, which use massive amounts of power. Earlier this month the company said a new data center in Arizona will be powered entirely by renewable energy, most of which will come from a new local solar farm. Apple said it will invest about $2 billion for the data center, which will produce 70 megawatts of clean energy, enough to power more than 14,500 Arizona homes.

The company will convert an existing manufacturing facility in Mesa into a “command center” for its global data center network. The Mesa site previously housed the failed Apple glass supplier GT Advanced Technologies (GTAT), which filed for bankruptcy in October. In a supplier agreement with Apple, GTAT was to supply "stab proof" sapphire glass for the iPhone 6, but when the facility failed to meet Apple's stringent quality standards, and efforts to renegotiate the agreement also failed, GTAT went under.

On the First Solar deal, Greenpeace senior IT sector analyst Gary Cook said: "It's one thing to talk about being 100 percent renewably powered, but it's quite another thing to make good on that commitment with the incredible speed and integrity that Apple has shown in the past two years. Apple still has work to do to reduce its environmental footprint, but other Fortune 500 CEOs would be well served to make a study of Tim Cook, whose actions show that he intends to take Apple full-speed ahead toward renewable energy with the urgency that our climate crisis demands."

Apple’s progress in meeting its commitment to 100 percent renewable energy helped the company earn positive scores in the most recent Greenpeace report analyzing major IT companies. Greenpeace said it will update its analysis of major internet companies’ use of renewable energy in April 2015.

Regarding the Arizona data center development, Greenpeace’s Cook said: "Arizona has some of the best solar potential in the world -- yet Arizona utilities and policymakers have been slow to tap the economic potential of solar, and some are still trying to slow the growth of solar."

Apple’s solar moves should serve as a template for other companies that want to use renewable energy, with the added plus of procuring and controlling energy on their own.

It’s a market-making transaction from a market leader.

Image: Apple logo by Paul Downey via Flickr

3P ID
210216
Prime
Off

Policy Points: Bringing America’s Workforce into the 21st Century

3P Author ID
8590
Primary Category
Content

By Zach Bernstein

What do the United States and Papua New Guinea have in common, aside from nice beaches?

Well, as it turns out, the two countries actually have one disappointing fact in common: They’re the only two countries that don’t guarantee paid time off for new mothers. Current U.S. law, the Family and Medical Leave Act, covers only part of the workforce.

The good news is that this could be changing. Some states are considering paid leave laws of their own. Those that have already passed them continue to reap the benefits. Most promisingly, paid leave has earned a strong defender in President Barack Obama.

“Since paid sick leave won where it was on the ballot last November, let’s put it to a vote right here in Washington,” he said in his recent State of the Union speech, where the theme of middle-class economics was prevalent. “Send me a bill that gives every worker in America the opportunity to earn seven days of paid sick leave. It’s the right thing to do.”

Last year, we wrote that paid leave was one of three signs of hope from 2014, mostly due to successful efforts on the local level. So far, there’s every indication that 2015 will be the year this issue really sees momentum pick up.

One big happy FAMILY (Act)


President Obama was likely referring to the proposed Healthy Families Act, which would guarantee up to seven paid sick days. That’s just one effort to better minimum paid leave standards for America’s workforce. Another prominent bill is the Family and Medical Insurance Leave, or FAMILY, Act. That bill was introduced in the last Congress by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), and it's expected to be reintroduced in this Congress soon. (There was also a recently introduced bill which would give all federal employees paid time off following childbirth.)

While these bills address the same basic concern, they do it a bit differently. The Healthy Families Act would allow workers to take time off to recover from their own illnesses, allowing them to earn one hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked.

The FAMILY Act, meanwhile, would guarantee 12 weeks of paid leave to care for family members or following childbirth, with workers earning benefits equal to 66 percent of their monthly wages. Similar to Social Security and Medicare, it would be funded by employee contributions of 0.20 percent of wages. Put another way, of every $10 earned, the contribution would be 2 cents.

Business groups like the American Sustainable Business Council (ASBC) support this kind of legislation because they, and so many businesses, recognize that having paid leave wouldn’t be a major burden on American entrepreneurs. Instead it would pay major dividends.

The evidence shows that productivity goes up when companies institute paid sick leave. Put simply, when workers know they can take time off for medical issues – and still get paid – they’re less stressed. That means they’re more productive. Also they are less likely to look for work elsewhere – which means less employee turnover, and lower costs for businesses.

Leave at the local level


As is often the case, it’s the states where progress is looking more likely, at least for the time being. Before this year, three states -- California, New Jersey and Rhode Island -- passed paid leave policies of their own. (A fourth, in Washington state, has been held up for years.) Then came election night 2014, when Massachusetts, along with two New Jersey towns and Oakland, California, all passed paid leave initiatives. As with issues like the minimum wage, the public is far ahead of its representatives – and that includes small business owners.

Of course, there’s still room to grow. Last year, ASBC led a campaign to show business support (PDF) for proposed paid family leave insurance legislation in New York state. That legislation did not make it through, but momentum remains strong heading into this year. Other states, like Maryland, are also pushing to get laws passed.

As always, it’s better to have a uniform system across the entire country than a patchwork of state laws, with some states offering different paid leave options and many states not doing so. But these state and local initiatives still represent the next best opportunity if Congress continues to stall. And progress at the state and local level proves to the rest of the county that paid leave isn’t going to break businesses -- and that doing right by workers can have broader economic benefits as well.

We have learned that the voice of business people speaking in support of these policies has been critical to their success. More business support will definitely be needed to keep the momentum up in the states – and build momentum in Washington. The ASBC Action Fund has business petitions for both earned sick leave and family medical leave insurance. Interested business owners can sign them as a first step in their advocacy.

In a weekly address not long after his State of the Union speech, President Obama expanded on his arguments in favor of paid leave: “We’ll help working families’ paychecks go farther by treating things like paid leave and child care like the economic priorities that they are.”

Paid leave’s progress in 2014 shows that he’s not the only policymaker who recognizes how important it is not just for families, but for businesses too. Let’s hope more will step up in 2015.

Image credit: Flickr/Colum O'Dwyer

Zach Bernstein is the Manager of Research and Social Media for the American Sustainable Business Council. Policy Points is produced by the American Sustainable Business Council. The editor is Richard Eidlin, Vice President – Public Policy and Business Engagement.

3P ID
210222
Prime
Off

Volkswagen to Invest $10 Million in U.S. EV Charging Infrastructure

3P Author ID
98
Primary Category
Content

It took 50 years from the time the first gas stations cropped up until a nationwide network of gasoline and diesel filling stations emerged. Despite technological, economic and political obstacles, building out a nationwide web of electric-vehicle (EV) charging stations and supporting infrastructure is likely to emerge in far less time, perhaps as little as two decades.

On Jan. 23, two of the world's largest automakers – Volkswagen and BMW – announced they are teaming up with ChargePoint to build out EV fast-charging station corridors on the U.S. East and West coasts. The project is the largest and most ambitious since Tesla announced plans to build out a cross-country chain of EV charging stations back in late 2012.

Volkswagen of America on Feb. 10 followed up with a dollar figure, announcing it will invest $10 million in the EV infrastructure project by 2016. In a presentation given at the 2015 Electric Drive Congress in Washington, D.C., Jörg Sommer,  VW of America vice president of product marketing and strategy, also called on the federal, state and local governments to do more to promote the build-out of EV infrastructure.

A holistic, dedicated approach to overall sustainability


VW management is demonstrating a wholehearted commitment to overall sustainability throughout and beyond the value chain of its commercial activities -- whether in Germany, here in the U.S. or in any of the 22 countries in which it has a manufacturing presence. Back in November, management announced it is on track to meet the sustainability goals set out in the company's five-year “Think Blue. Factory” strategic plan.

In carrying out “Think Blue. Factory,” VW has instituted or will institute no less than 5,000 individual measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and pollution, conserve energy, water and materials, and help assure ecosystems and natural resources are protected and conserved.

“We will continue to invest in the future to become the leading automotive group in both ecological and economic terms – with the best and most sustainable products,” Prof. Dr. Martin Winterkorn, chairman of the Volkswagen AG Board of Management, said during an address at VW headquarters in Wolfsburg, Germany.

EV charging, zero-tailpipe emissions and e-mobility

Volkswagen's vision of zero tailpipe emissions e-mobility lies at the core of its holistic take on sustainability in the auto sector. The build-out of EV charging infrastructure is a keystone if VW, as well as BMW and other EV auto manufacturers, plan to capitalize on the development of EV markets in the U.S. and worldwide.

With the announcement that it will invest $10 million of its own capital by 2016 in building out EV charging infrastructure in the U.S., VW America is contributing to the cause. In addressing attendees at the 2015 Electric Drive Congress in D.C. this week, Sommer stated that Volkswagen "believes continued legislative support is needed to reach the next level of electric vehicle adoption."

“Automakers have effectively delivered electric vehicles that can satisfy the needs of most American drivers. In addition to the investment we and other companies and industries are making, we would like to see federal financing support for establishing fast charging networks in urban areas and interstate corridors,” Sommer said.

In addressing 2015 Electric Car Congress participants, Sommer also highlighted the holistic approach and broad-based efforts VW has put into effect as it seeks to realize its “Think Blue. Factory” goals and vision of e-mobility for the 21st century. In addition to its recent announcement of its partnership with BMW and Chargepoint, these include a partnership with 3Degrees, a developer of renewable energy and carbon offset projects, a joint program with SunPower to provide qualified VW e-Golf customers to have high-performance solar photovoltaic (PV) systems installed, and a partnership with Bosch that offers VW EV customers home charging installation and hardware packages.

*Images credit: VW Group AG

3P ID
210228
Prime
Off

Losing the Ecological War on Terror

3P Author ID
100
Primary Category
Content

By Victoria Griffith

The recent assassination of environmental activist Edwin Chota, who fought tirelessly to expel illegal loggers who operated with impunity in the Amazon rainforest, has implications that go well beyond the loss of a single man, as important as his work was for the defense of the Amazon. For decades, those fighting on the front lines of the green war have been terrorized in a bid to silence them and demoralize others who might take their place. And the rest of the world has failed to take notice.

Chota’s demise is all the more tragic because it was so preventable. Despite the death threats he had been receiving for months, authorities failed to provide adequate protection.

Chota, killed on Sept. 8, 2014, with four colleagues from the Asheninka tribe, led the battle to gain title to native lands on the Peruvian side of the Amazon rainforest. The murders were reportedly revenge by criminal loggers who Chota reported to authorities. His assassins were hardly lurking in the shadows. Rather, the men were killed as their entire village looked helplessly on, an example to anyone else who might dare to defend their native land. The slaying fits an ongoing pattern of Mafioso-style murders meant to subvert opposition to local gangs’ illegal activities.

It’s been more than 25 years since Brazilian rubber tapper Chico Mendes was gunned down outside his house in an incident that shocked the global green movement. The conviction of the men who ordered and carried out his execution was meant to hail a new era of accountability for violence against environmental activists. Yet since then such crimes have only escalated.

According to the U.K.-based human rights group Global Witness, 147 people were murdered in 2012 for their green convictions (the latest year data is available), compared to 51 in 2002. Brazil, where most of the Amazon rainforest is located, has the worst record; of the 908 documented environmental executions that occurred between 2002 and 2013, 448 happened in Brazil. Even those numbers vastly understate the case, according to the Pastoral Land Commission (CPT), a nonprofit based in Acre, Brazil, which places the number of assassinations in the thousands.

Authorities argue that the murder sites in question are too remote to provide adequate police protection. Yet there is little doubt that the killers believe they can act with impunity. Less than 1 percent of environmentally-motivated murders are ever brought to trial, according to Global Witness and the CPT.

Justice is hard to come by even in the most high-profile cases. In 2011, green crusaders Maria and Jose Claudio da Silva were brutally killed near their home in the Brazilian state of Para by gunmen passing by on a motorcycle. While local courts convicted the two men who pulled the triggers, they failed to imprison the farmer said to have ordered the assassinations. The slayings occurred not far from the site where the Ohio-born nun Dorothy Stang was shot and killed in 2005 over her defense of the rainforest. In a travesty of justice, it took eight years to convict one of the ranchers said to have ordered her execution. The rancher’s co-conspirator was released shortly after being sentenced to 30-year jail term; he successfully argued that he should remain free pending his appeal. Reasons for the inadequate response, say green organizations, are clear: Corruption runs rampant as gangsters pay off local authorities to look the other way.

The rest of the world should not follow suit. The rape of the Amazon and other important forest areas has far-reaching implications. According to the Environmental Defense Fund, a leading green organization, deforestation now contributes more to global warming than the emissions of the entire global transportation center. The destruction of the rainforest also has a chilling impact on biodiversity. An average 4-square-mile area in the Amazon holds 750 distinct species of trees, 400 species of birds and 150 species of butterflies, says the nonprofit Nature Conservancy.

Chico Mendes once said: “At first I thought I was fighting to save rubber trees. Then I thought I was fighting to save the Amazon rainforest. Now I realize I am fighting for humanity.” The defenders of humanity need our protection. Pressure must be applied to governments at a local, state and federal level to prevent violence against environmental activists. And when violence does occur, the killers – those who ordered the assassinations as well as those who pulled the triggers – must be severely punished.

It’s time to bring the environmental war of terror to an end. This month, Chota joined a growing list of ecological martyrs. At some point, the world may simply run out of heroes.

Victoria Griffith is the author of "Amazon Burning" (Astor + Blue, October 2014), an environmental thriller based on the Chico Mendes murder.

3P ID
210250
Prime
Off