Search

Beef or Cow? Researchers Find the Way We Talk About Meat Matters

3P Author ID
9924
Primary Category
Content

"If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be a vegetarian." Those words, uttered by Paul McCartney, embody a common belief among vegetarians and animal rights activists — that the greatest barrier to reducing meat consumption is the opacity of our supply chains.

Indeed, for anyone who's ever watched a PETA video, the impact of empathy on meat eating seems intuitively obvious.

Still, until recently, there was precious little empirical evidence to prove the point. Now, a group of researchers from Norway is moving the conversation forward.

In a study published this month in the journal Appetite, the researchers argue that the way meat is processed, labeled, and advertised makes it easier for consumers to dissociate their hamburger or steak from the animals they once were.

Overcoming the empathy gap


The scientists, working at the University of Oslo, performed a series of five different experiments among American and Norwegian consumers.

First, they examined the impact of different processing methods on consumer behavior (i.e., a slab of bacon versus a whole, suckling pig).

"Processed meat made participants less empathetic towards the slaughtered animal than unprocessed meat," wrote lead author Jonas Kunst. "When beheaded, a whole roasted pork evoked less empathy and disgust than when the head was present ... [which], in turn, made participants more willing to eat the roast and less willing to consider an alternative vegetarian dish."

The researchers observed similar responses when they presented consumers with meat advertisements that included images of living animals; described industrial meat production using terms such as "kill" or "slaughter," rather than euphemisms like "harvest;" and replaced terms like "beef" or "pork" with "cow" or "pig" on restaurant menus.

Temperatures are on the rise — but so is meat consumption


The findings could prove significant to global efforts to move consumers toward a more plant-based diet in response to rising global temperatures.

Less than a month ago, the United Nations released a troubling new report arguing that radical agricultural reform was needed to avoid pushing as many as 122 million more people into extreme poverty. In a prior report, the U.N. noted that as much as 15 percent of all global greenhouse gas emissions originated from the livestock industry.

Despite such dire statistics, meat consumption is on the rise in the United States. Also in October, Dutch company Rabobank, which closely monitors agricultural trends, reported that per-capita meat consumption rose nearly 5 percent in 2015 — the steepest increase in 40 years — and was expected to increase by an average of 2.5 percent more per year through 2018.

The increase came after several years of declines, which many attributed to increased consumer concern about the environmental, health and ethical implications of meat consumption.

Now, that does not seem to be the case. Instead, it looks like consumers' movement away from meat had more to do with economics than ethics.

"There’s a roller-coaster effect here, and we are about to start an upswing," Will Sawyer, an animal protein analyst with Rabobank, told Vox recently. "... All those U.S. consumers that got priced out of the beef market are going to be able to come back to price level that they haven’t seen for five to six years."

With economic trends encouraging consumers to increase their meat consumption in the short term and the twin threat of global warming and population growth making it increasingly vital to cut our consumption in the long term, advocates and regulators would be wise to consider how they can exploit this "carnivore's paradox" to drive more sustainable behavior.

Image credit: Flickr/John Henderson

3P ID
251124
Prime
Off

Millennials Push Fast Food Revenue Off a Cliff

3P Author ID
307
Primary Category
Content

McDonald's just reported a 3 percent revenue decline. This is a stunning reversal in the company’s history. From 2005 to 2013, McDonald's grew revenues by almost 50 percent, or $10 billion.

Why did McDonald's see its sales fall? In a word: millennials.

By 2014, when McDonald's began to experience declining revenues, the average millennial was 23 years old. As adults, millennials are now the most employed demographic group in our economy. They are financially recovering from the Great Recession and school debt. And they are taking over our economy!

With the emergence of millennials as the economic drivers of our economy, McDonald's faces a stark reality: Only 1 out of 5 millennials have eaten McDonald’s signature Big Mac hamburger.

Even more telling for future fast food sales: Millennial parents represent 42 percent of households with children.

The question confronting the fast food industry is whether millennial moms will take their families to eat fast food.

California millennials define the fast food industry’s revenue crisis


I raised my two millennial generation kids in Moraga, California. Moraga is a suburban town located in the East Bay of San Francisco. When I moved to Moraga in 1997, the town had three fast food chain restaurants. One is now closed. Another is about to close.

This is the fast food industry’s worst nightmare come true. Moraga used to be the industry's type of town. It is a town centered around neighborhoods, great schools and kids. “Moraga Mom” is a term of pride earned by dedicated mothers.

What happened to fast food in Moraga?

My own experience is a possible explanation. My millennial-generation kids became food activists during their teenage years. I bought them computers, and one of things they did with them was figure out how to think for themselves. And they decided fast food was a threat to their health and future. Because I was 30 pounds overweight at the time, my kids began banging on me to stop eating fast food. Every day they tried to get me to stop drinking my beloved Diet Coke.

This experience with my kids was not an isolated incident. Millennials at Moraga’s local college, Mount St. Mary, started a student-operated organic garden. The students invested their time at this garden to achieve both a healthier diet plus food cost savings.

Moraga Moms join millennials to focus on healthy food


At the same time I was becoming aware of how millennials were shifting away from fast food, I also began to see increased health activism from Moraga Moms. I was honored to serve on Sustainable Moraga, a volunteer organization growing awareness about what our town could do to be sustainable. When I first joined this group, it was a lonely experience of meetings attended by a small number of engaged citizens. But then something telling happened. A Moraga Mom showed up at our meeting in panic mode over the use of pesticides at the town’s middle school. A longer story made shorter, this mom galvanized her peer group and was able to stop pesticide use at our schools.

Examples of increased health activism by Moraga Moms extended throughout the community. My wife joined other local moms in volunteering at the organic Moraga Community Gardens. Moraga also started a farmers market, and it is anchored financially by Moraga Moms’ purchases.

It was this nexus of Moraga’s moms and millennials that undercut the sale of fast food restaurants in the city. Millennials saw fast food as not being cool and not aligned with their quest for purpose. Moraga Moms rejected fast food as unhealthy for their families. The area restaurants with growing sales are the ones offering locally-grown, fresh and healthier food. Their food still has to be tasty. But now it also has to be healthier.

The three drivers that are pushing fast food sales over the cliff


Based on my experiences, and key demographic trends reshaping our economy, these three drivers are pushing fast food sales toward a revenue cliff:

  1. Over 70 percent of the boomer generation, the anchoring fast food customer, is now overweight or obese. The boomer generation is slowly, but unavoidably, facing a diet-based health crisis that will force them to reduce or stop their purchase of fast foods and soda. The boomer generation is emerging into a era where they will be too sick to eat fast food or drink soda.

  2. The millennial generation is moving past fast food. Lower prices will not win them back. Doing less harm will not win them back. They want purposeful food that is diverse, socially engaging and healthy. Until the fast food industry can deliver that recipe, it will not win millennials as customers.

  3. Millennial moms are emerging as a disruptive demographic group that may forever crush the fast food industry’s revenues. If 80 percent of millennials have never eaten a Big Mac, then how likely will it be that they will ever serve it to their children? That question haunts the fast food industry’s revenue growth potential and may just determine its future.
Image courtesy of the author
3P ID
251063
Prime
Off

Peace Corps Shutters Popular Advanced Degree Program

3P Author ID
6731
Primary Category
Content

By John Stapleton

Danielle Salisbury just came back from the Peace Corps and is stepping back into her graduate program in Environmental Policy at Bard College. After working with local people to protect a biosphere reserve in the Mexican state of Queretaro, she will graduate this spring with her Master of Science degree.

Danielle, like hundreds of American graduate students over the past 30 years, combined Peace Corps service with education through Peace Corps' Masters International. The program, dubbed MI, allows students take graduate courses for a year, enter the Peace Corps, then use the two-year international experience as a springboard for research.

“MI was the best way to do the Peace Corps,” Dr. Eban Goodstein, director of Graduate Programs in Sustainability at Bard. “Not only did students bring greater expertise to their service, [but they also] got more out of it. MI-inspired thesis projects really benefit the country in which students have served. They also created powerful foundations for subsequent careers in sustainable development.”

Sadly, Masters International is closing its doors this year. In announcing the program closure, the Peace Corps said the decision to shutter MI was a difficult one as the agency shifted priorities.

But the option to combine Peace Corps service with Masters education lives on in at least two graduate programs: Bard’s Center for Environmental Policy and the Middlebury Institute for International Study at Monterrey. Both institutions will continue to provide graduate students with the ability to embed a Peace Corps experience in the heart of their Masters program.

“This is too good an opportunity for our students to let it go,” says Dr. Jason Scorse, director of the Middlebury Institute’s MA in International Environmental Policy. “Graduate programs like ours that feature international focus and require professional experience, encourage and support students to integrate Peace Corps service into the Masters degree.”

Danielle’s master’s thesis will assess whether citizens value the environmental programming in the Mexican reserve where she worked. “I am developing a meaningful thesis project that will benefit not only my community, but the biosphere reserve to which it belongs,” Danielle reports. “I could not have done this without the Peace Corps. It was the perfect complement to my Masters degree."

Want to integrate the real world with your graduate studies? If you hurry, the full list of former MI Partner Schools is still on the Web. Contact these graduate schools to see if Peace Corps service can still be integrated into the Masters programs they offer, or contact Bard and Middlebury to grab this incredible opportunity.

Image courtesy of Danielle Salisbury

John Stapleton is a returned Peace Corp Volunteer, and a Masters International graduate in Environmental Policy from Bard College.

3P ID
251256
Prime
Off

Boost Employee Engagement in Three Steps

3P Author ID
100
Primary Category
Content

By Annabelle Smyth

What is the true cost of a disengaged employee?

According to a recent Gallup poll, employees who are not engaged in the workplace cost the U.S. economy $450 billion to $550 billion per year.

And this shocking number doesn’t illustrate the impact of disengaged employees on company culture, the high turnover of their productive colleagues and the harm they cause to brands. The poll also revealed that approximately 70 percent of employees in the U.S. are not engaged – that’s nearly 3 out of every 4 employees!

So, what’s the solution to this costly dilemma?

Check out the three steps below to get started on the path to increasing employee engagement and reaping the benefits of a dedicated workforce.

1. The underutilized one-on-one conversation


Sometimes, the direct approach is the most effective.

The key is to have one-on-one conversations with your employees that actually matter. If your employees walk away from these meetings feeling as if they aren’t being heard or valued, then you are doing something wrong

There are several different approaches to having a successful one-one-one, but all of them involve creating a space where individuals feel comfortable enough to discuss their concerns, ideas and plans with you. A few things you may want to keep in mind for fruitful one-one-one meetings include:


  • Asking the right questions

  • Making sure your employees feel heard

  • Being open about your shortcomings

  • Giving your employees the opportunity to direct your meeting

  • Showing respect for them as a person

When you make it clear that these events are meant to be a conversation, it supports an open exchange and can help you identify issues that are causing employees to be disengaged. Taking the time to inquire about specific issues and areas for improvement that would increase employee satisfaction can go a long way toward boosting engagement in the workplace.

2. Uncovering the root of the problem


If you fail to discover the underlying problem, your attempts to get employees to enthusiastically carry out your company’s goals will likely fail.

Sometimes the issue stems from something that is taking place in the employee’s personal life, but the most common cause of disengaged employees often lies with your company. For example, a recent reward and recognition survey by Bamboo HR revealed that 82 percent of employees were bothered by a lack of recognition for their accomplishments.

A few areas that have the potential to damage the passion and loyalty of your workforce include:


  • Low compensation

  • High healthcare costs

  • Limited or no employee perks

  • Poor workplace communication

  • Micromanagement

  • Lack of recognition

The reasons behind poor engagement will vary with each individual, but if you identify a specific company policy or procedure that upsets one of your employees, some of their peers may also have an issue with it. Once you determine the root issue, it’s critical to follow up with action to show the employee/employees in questions that you care and are working to resolve the problem.

3. The power of employee recognition programs


A recent survey of 1,000 employees from different businesses found a strong correlation between recognition and job satisfaction. Approximately 70 percent of employees who felt appreciated for their work were also happy at their jobs. Whereas only 39 percent of employees who did not receive recognition were satisfied with their jobs.

In order to show appreciation for specific employee achievements, it’s necessary to have a process in place to track productivity, goal completions and general results. Technology has simplified this process, and even works to increase engagement through employee gamification. Once you find a system that monitors the ideal performance indicators, you can then move forward with different types of recognition programs.

Some popular ways to show appreciation include bonuses, public recognition, gift cards, time off and company trips just to name a few. You can also give your employees the option to choose their preferred reward for meeting the goals that have been set out for them.

Investing the time and resources to show your employees that they are valued will often more than pay for itself with strong retention rates, an improved company culture, higher levels of productivity and elevated business results.

Disengaged employees not only hurt your team, they also impact the bottom line of your company. By re-engaging them into the company, you will be able to improve the overall work atmosphere, enhance productivity and ultimately increase revenue.

Image credit: Pixabay

Annabelle Smyth is a freelance writer who covers everything from HR to technology and leadership skills. She enjoys that variety and exploration that comes with her work but has a special interest in social activism and leadership.

3P ID
251252
Prime
Off

Will Hurricane Matthew Inspire Safer Buildings?

3P Author ID
100
Primary Category
Content

By Scott Huntington

Although Hurricane Matthew wasn't nearly as catastrophic as some feared and expected, its wrath was still felt throughout the Southeastern United States. Despite widespread flooding, torrential rain and even the loss of human life, including dozens in the U.S. alone, many buildings in the region actually withstood the storm quite well. Moreover, homeowners who did suffer property damage are already taking steps to safeguard their belongings in the future.

Securing the community


By looking at the aftermath of Hurricane Matthew, it's easy to identify some shortcomings. Personal docks, boats and other seaside properties were damaged all along Daytona Beach and St. Augustine Beach, while hundreds of thousands of consumers went without power in Florida. If that wasn't challenging enough, rising waters in some areas were only made worse by clogged drainage ditches and channels.

To prevent this in the future, homeowners should ensure their personal docks and connecting stairways are reinforced with storm-resistant building materials. Gas-powered generators are a great option during extended power outages, as are flashlights, lanterns, and even propane or charcoal grills. Although you may have to get creative, it's usually not too difficult to live comfortably in the midst of a storm.

Securing your life


Regardless of all the safeguards and storm-proofing in place, sometimes you have no other choice but to evacuate. In the case of a county- or state-mandated evacuation, refer to your local emergency broadcast stations, either on television or radio, for information on specific routes, detours and shelters.

Securing your car


Modern building methods, especially those used in the Southeastern U.S., utilize a number of storm-resistant features. Hurricane Matthew saw more than one family park their cars in their living rooms because it was safer than being outside. As such, many homeowners are now turning their attention to the garage, making sure it’s up to code as well.

Securing your home


If you're like millions of other Americans, your home means the world to you. As such, it's crucial to properly safeguard your property, your belongings, and your family from hurricanes, tornados, floods and other natural disasters. When doing so, make sure to inspect your home's roof, external doors and windows. If flooding is expected, you may want to consider placing sandbags around the foundation of your home as one final barrier for the impending storm.

Some states, including Florida, even passed legislation to mandate a certain amount of storm-proofing in new or recently renovated homes. According to the new standards, which were prompted by Hurricane Andrew in 1992, homes must be able to handle a minimum of 124 mph sustained winds in addition to short gusts of 160 mph.

Overcoming natural disasters now and in the future


There's no denying that the Southeastern United States has seen its fair share of storms. While Hurricane Matthew is the most recent, it certainly won't be the last. However, with a little bit of forethought, research and elbow grease, you can ensure the safety of your home throughout nearly any natural disaster.

Image credit: Pixabay

Scott Huntington is a writer and blogger. Follow him on Twitter @SMHuntington

3P ID
250333
Prime
Off

Taking the lead in stormy times

Primary Category
Content
By Adam Woodhall — How are corporate sustainability professionals—and the organisations they work with—to lead through this post-Brexit period facing our society? How are they looking to turn the daunting challenges of unprecedented uncertainty for British society into opportunities?   
 
Two reports issued earlier this year, pre-Brexit, offer some prescient clues for leaders to navigate the post-Brexit stormy waters ahead. Exhibit A: "A Behavioural Competency Model for Sustainability Leaders" by Beth Knight of EY, delivered through the Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership. Exhibit B: "Beyond the Perfect Storm,” by the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA).  
 
The challenge consists of the multifaceted social and environmental issues that our society faces, the so-called “Wicked Problems”. Mankind has always faced these, but in the past, issues were either more localised and/or there were strong actors who could drive the agenda. 
 
We arguably have a much more distributed locus of authority now, with the decline of government’s power to manage problems and the parallel rise in the influence of private enterprise. This gives business the opportunity to effect positive change and take responsibility for what happens next. However, the massive amount of complex flux (technological, economic, environmental) means that there are especially difficult choices to be made, particularly for those who have responsibility for guiding their organisations in handling these wicked problems through their sustainability strategies and practices.   
 
The warning contained in the IEMA report demonstrates that the ‘weather’ is closing in on many fronts. To pick just two areas, climate change and pollution, the statistics are pointing towards very unsettled conditions. There is now more than 400PPM of CO2 in Earth’s atmosphere, and global warming reached one degree above pre-industrial times for the first time in 2015.  Regarding pollution, an estimated 12.6 million people died as a result of living or working in an unhealthy environment in 2012 – nearly one in four of total global deaths, according to estimates from the World Health Organisation.   
 
Results of a survey included in the IEMA report indicate that for many working in sustainability, there is a still a long way to go in embedding sustainability, with only 25% indicating general support within their organisation.  Therefore, there is a real opportunity for leadership.  
 
Beth Knight’s findings are particularly informative. She observes: “For those of us who work as Sustainability Leaders, one of the early ‘aha’ moments of our career are that, invariably, some of our efforts for a more sustainable world will work while many will not. A key factor in the success of any change initiative is the design and implementation of the initiative itself, which in turn highlights the need for designers (i.e. Sustainability Leaders) with the ability to ‘get the job done’! 
 
“Existing academic literature suggests that Sustainability Leaders need a wide-ranging and divergent mix of behavioural competencies to be successful. This formed the basis of my dissertation research as part of the Master’s in Sustainability Leadership. To test whether such behaviours are displayed in practice, I used a psychometric questionnaire (Wave Professional Styles) to assess the behavioural competencies of ninety-seven Sustainability Leaders.” 
 
Knight’s research was based on a structure which had five headline aptitudes, with four competencies each as illustrated in the diagram. She found that the top ten competencies of Sustainability Leaders are: developing expertise; impressing people; establishing rapport; articulating information; interacting with people; valuing individuals; exploring possibilities; generating ideas; challenging ideas; and understanding people.
 
Six sustainability leaders offer thoughts on how to lead in post-Brexit times
 
Charles O’Malley, the founder of LEADX, an initiative of the Responsible Leadership Forum, contextualises the situation: 
“While we have a political, economic, social system that appears to everybody to working well, there's little perceived appetite for change. In management speak, there’s no burning platform. Brexit is a shock to the system, and it’s inevitable that we'll have an increasing scale and severity of shocks due to other aspects of the ‘stormy waters’. ?On the one hand, that doesn't sound like very good news, but equally, it is a necessary and inevitable part of our systems’ breakdown that a new system emerges which works more effectively.” 
 
Dame Polly Courtice, Director of the Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership, underlines the urgency for action: 
“The Brexit referendum offered a seemingly clear and binary decision. However, two months later, the final outcome and long-term implications are far from clear. This has caused a huge amount of uncertainty. This mustn’t be used as an excuse for delaying action on sustainability. 
Whatever the final outcome, it is clear that global challenges such as climate change, inequality and biodiversity collapse require a global response. These issues do not respect borders, and in an increasingly connected global society, countries will have to find more effective forms of collaboration and communication. 
 
Managing Brexit calls for exactly the kind of leadership that is needed for sustainability – the kind we foster at the CISL. This kind of leadership builds trust and understanding across deep divides; makes decisions for the long- term, based on the best available evidence and in the widest interests of society; navigates complexity, uncertainty and volatility; collaborates; and above all, offers the strong and visionary leadership so urgently needed to secure the future.” 
 
Dr Alexandra Stubbings, Director of Talik & Company and a member of the Institute of Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability (ICRS), suggests what a major role for sustainability professionals can be: 
“Post-Brexit, a number of senior business decision makers have been shaken by the realisation that there are some deeply disenfranchised people, and this means they are broadening the stakeholders they are talking to.  We are starting to see some deeper questions being asked about what it means to be a corporate, whether this is in construction, energy or fast moving consumer goods.  Some senior leaders are broadening what they think about, trying to make sense of what is going on, considering what business exists for and what is its purpose.” 
 
“If there is one key thing that sustainability professionals can do which can be helpful to those senior leaders, it is the sense making, by pulling in data. Our job can therefore be to help with more informed and meaningful understanding. Furthermore, don't be paralysed into taking no action, and don't take rash action.” 
 
Frank Krikhaar, Global Corporate Social Responsibility Director of Dentsu Aegis Media, a multinational media and digital marketing communications firm, looks at his own organisation and how collaboration can happen:  
“Today’s digital economy is bringing complexity, speed of change and disruption to traditional business models. From our point of view, this means we need sustainability professionals who work at the forefront of change in their own industry. Half of our sustainability teams at Dentsu Aegis Network are internal promotions and secondments. Creating a cottage industry of CSR professionals who speak a language only they themselves understand doesn’t create the systemic changes organisations needs to survive. Bring together our internal change makers and intrapreneurs, mobilise our own people and put them on sustainability briefs—that’s our mantra. 
 
We also need each and every industry to adopt collaborative approaches to solving issues together. That’s why we launched the Common Ground initiative with the United Nations to address the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with the world’s biggest advertising and marketing groups. Competition can thrive hand-in-hand with cooperation across peers and into the supply chain, and foster a mindset that is emphatic, innovative and collaborative across the entire industry. Companies who shy away from this will find themselves shunned by their customers.”  
 
Matthew Sparkes, Head of Corporate Responsibility at Linklaters LLP and an ICRS board director, considers how it is possible to leverage the SDGs to help his firm navigate sustainability:  
“As a service business, our collective responsibility is really the sum of our people’s individual behaviour. It is therefore less about the 1% of time spent on ‘traditional’ CR such as delivering pro-bono advice and much more about the 99% of time our lawyers spend advising clients. Over recent years, we as a CR function have been working to broaden our relevance to this mainstream activity, encouraging and recognising appropriate behaviours during what remain challenging times. 
 
“Part of this mainstreaming has included considering our impact in light of the 17 SDGs. As well as community activity and pro bono work, we have looked at how we are addressing the goals through our operations and paid client work. It has been a real boost to see how much of our core activity supports many of the targets and we are now highlighting this internally and externally to show how a firm such as ours impacts positively on the most pressing issues of our generation.   
 
“One specific example is our Risk, Regulation and Governance practice.  SDG 16 promotes ‘peace, justice and strong institutions’ and the team’s expertise in good governance across all sectors is perfectly placed to support this goal. More broadly, the rule of law underpins not just a sustainable economy but also a healthy society and it is heartening to see how so much of our business contributes so directly to this.” 
 
An example of how a very large organisation can use grassroots leadership to support local causes at a national level is given by Jeff Oatham, Head of CR & Community Investment at Royal Mail:  
“We look to bring together people and different organisations to address a challenge in society. A few years ago we had a postman, Vincent Micallef, delivering mail and he was asked to help find a missing child. He not only did this, but took leadership and told colleagues to look out for the child. He saw an opportunity for Royal Mail to make a real difference. The CR team worked with the charity Missing People and the National Crime Agency to create a ground breaking initiative.” 
 
“A national partnership was made with the charity Missing People, and now Royal Mail distributes alerts of high risk missing people to around 120,000 front line employees and uses its PDA technology for a social benefit. Bringing together a small charity with a large organisation has made a huge difference, and this all started with Vincent’s leadership.” 
 
Conclusion 
The ‘Beyond the Perfect Storm’ report highlights a quote from Robert Swan, the polar explorer and environmentalist: “The greatest threat to our planet is the belief someone else will save it”. There are plenty of leaders who are taking action to support a continued flourishing of the society we all live in.  As Frank Krikhaar observes: “Those that don’t take action are at the mercy of the stormy weather ahead without any aids to help them stay buoyant.”
 
Prime
Off
Newsletter Sent
Off

The Institute of Business Ethics reports on best business practices for the next 30 years

Primary Category
Content
The Institute of Business Ethics is celebrating its 30th Anniversary with a report that looks at how trust in business can be regained. 
 
“The Institute of Business Ethics: The next thirty years” includes a survey that finds a new approach to business leadership is needed, based on consensus building, the ability to embed values and connect business to society.  
 
Philippa Foster Back CBE, IBE Director, (pictured above) said: “The age of deference is over. A succession of scandals has undermined trust, and business is too often seen as purely interested in profit. Leaders who see themselves as individual superstars will not be able to deal easily with this. We need to look for new models – leaders who are connected with their employees and society and use this talent to facilitate good and sustainable results”. 
 
To help identify its priorities for the coming period, the IBE sought the views of various opinion-leaders including company chairmen and directors, the media and others involved in the business world, accountants and lawyers as well as its trustees and senior advisers
  
Each respondent was asked to answer three questions: 
 
1.Why can’t business rebuild trust with the public?
 
2.What are the three biggest ethical challenges facing business? 
 
3.What should the IBE do over the next few years?
 
Back said: “In response to the survey, the IBE has set out an ambitious programme for the next few years particularly in reaching out to new audiences, and new entrants to the workplace, drawing on their fresh approach to business and technology to help these with more entrenched views. There is much for us to do.” 
 
The report – "The Institute of Business Ethics: The next thirty years" – was launched at an anniversary breakfast held at the Mansion House on 27 October – thirty years to the day since the IBE was launched at the same venue. The Lord Mayor, Alderman The Lord Mountevans and Sir Gerry Grimstone, Chairman of Standard Life and Deputy Chairman of Barclays, joined Philippa Foster Back CBE to talk about the changing business ethics landscape and what the future might look like. 
 
Prime
Off
Newsletter Sent
Off

10 things I've learnt in my 10 years in sustainability

Primary Category
Content
By Adam Woodhall — Ten years ago, I launched myself into the world of sustainability, and it’s been an amazing roller coaster journey. In 2006 there were some things I already knew—for example, that sustainability is good for people, profit and planet—but over the years, I’ve learnt many things, just 10 of which are below. These highlight aspects of my personal story and the wider narrative as I, and sustainability, have developed.
 
Serendipity is a beautiful thing 
I’m standing in the beautiful ballroom of the Leeds Club, and I’m tingling with excitement. It’s six weeks after An Inconvenient Truth was premiered, and I’m about to launch my own specialist employee engagement consultancy, PeopleProfitPlanet. Serendipity has smiled on me, and the day before, the seminal Stern Review on the economics of climate change was launched. Therefore, I could stand in front of the assembled Yorkshire business leaders, hold up a national newspaper hot off the press with the front-page headline ‘The Heat is On’, and authentically say, “Being green isn’t just good for the environment, it’s also good for business”.  
 
The interactive session, including a game called Carbon Bingo, received many compliments. Even better it produced my first big client: Enterprise Rent-a-Car, the first of many such as PwC, Southern Rail, Parcelforce, First Direct Bank and Brunel University. Even before I delivered to Enterprise, serendipity again beamed on me, as my first ever paid delivery, to Bauman Lyons Architects, was on 15th January 2007, which happily was also the day M&S launched its ground breaking Plan A.
 
You can't rely on serendipity
In 2007, there was considerable confidence—in part due to Gore’s movie, Stern’s report, and Mike Barry’s* Plan A—that both my business, and sustainability generally, would grow rapidly.  They grew, but not exponentially. The easy answer would be to look at the financial crash of 2008, and the political failure of COP15 in Copenhagen in 2009 and say they knocked sustainability, and myself, sideways. Whilst the serendipity of the earlier events was important, and the brakes applied by the latter events unfortunate, there are many other factors required for transformation.  
 
'Selling' sustainability isn't easy. Selling behaviour change is bloody difficult 
Sustainability seemingly has an inherent logic, which ‘should’ mean that organisations adopt it enthusiastically. If only life were that easy.  I’ve heard many colleagues in the sustainability industry bemoaning excellent business cases ignored and capital expenditure plans torpedoed.  
 
Behaviour change appears to have an even more convincing wisdom: it costs little or nothing to implement, saves money immediately and people feel better about themselves. However, as it’s intangible and relies on humans, not machines, to keep it operating, it is something many organisations have on their ‘to-do’ list, but, honourable exceptions aside (step forward M&S and Interface Carpets), most are limited, tactical and reactive.
 
Fear undermines everything it touches
My initial hopes for the growth of my consultancy, and sustainability, were therefore comparatively underperforming by 2010. Now whilst the external situation was nowhere near as rosy as it looked in 2006, it would however be disingenuous if I didn’t have a hard look at itself, and recognise that fear was holding me back. The main elephant in my room was regarding writing: I often found it terrifying. I positively thrived when put in front of people, be it a workshop of two or a conference of 200, but put me in front of a computer with a proposal or report to write and I’d find any excuse to avoid it, which of course wasn’t great for business.  
 
Fear of the consequences of climate change also permeated the public communication of solutions to it. The focus was too often on melting icebergs, the potential for flooding cities and similar catastrophes. Focusing on these fears, and getting people to believe they must be part of the solution, however true they might be, just meant most people felt disempowered to be able to do anything.
 
All you need is love... and a purpose and bloody mindedness
Whilst I was comparatively struggling to deal with all this, the support and love of family, friends, colleagues and clients was key in keeping me going. It also helped that I felt a deep purpose: to be part of the solution and to ‘inspire sustainability’. Furthermore, a bloody-minded desire to not be beat helped too.
 
Learn from 'failure'
As Richard Branson said: “Do not be embarrassed by your failures, learn from them and start again”. The success of the Paris Agreement at COP21 is arguably in large part because the climate change negotiators successfully learnt the lessons from COP15. Similarly, I listened to the feedback I was getting. My first innovation, in 2010, was to bring on board two business partners to drive the consultancy forward (and do the writing). This did lead to some great client wins, but ultimately we were too small, too specialist, and being based in Leeds didn’t help, so I sold the business to a larger London based consultancy and made a new beginning in the big smoke.  
 
Action creates belief
I started my career in sustainability because I believed in it, and so acted based on that belief.  It was logical therefore to look to create belief in others, so they would act. Back in 2006 that was everybody’s theory of change. I slowly and somewhat painfully discovered, that for most people, most of the time, the opposite is true; action is what creates belief. Therefore, when working with consultancy clients, and myself, creating action is now what I focus on.  
 
Empowering change is possible: set an intention and JFDI**
In 2015 I started a new full time job at a Carbon Smart and I was supported to write a guidebook called Empower Change. It wasn’t easy, but with a bit of that bloody mindedness, I gritted my teeth and launched it to widespread approval. I’d felt genuinely empowered by my boss. I still found writing painful, but now it was more like stabbing the bottom of my foot with a pin, rather than stabbing my eye with a pin like it was before.  
 
By 2016 I’d become freelance and it didn’t like feel a stupid idea that I could write regularly. So, I set myself an intention to write an article every week about anything, which took my fancy, and found that it was flowing easily. To support the launch of Empower Change in 2015, I’d written an article for free for Ethical Performance magazine (which I hadn’t found easy!). As I was getting into the habit of JFDI’ing, I thought it was a good idea to have a Skype with their new Managing Editor. We got on famously, and having seen my Empower Change article, he asked me to write another one, and this time offered to pay me.  Magically within six weeks of setting my intention, I was being paid to write, as I continue to be. By taking action, I now have belief in my ability to write, and you’ll be pleased to know that no pins were felt whilst writing this article; just the opposite in fact: I’ve enjoyed myself!
 
Sustainability can be entertaining
At around the same time as starting my surprising new career as a writer and journalist, I more intentionally did a Sustainable Stand Up course. My theory was that sustainability could be a bit lighter, and whilst public speaking didn’t present me with any issues, making people intentionally laugh was a new edge. Again, the standing up bit didn’t scare me, but the sitting at a blank Word document knowing I needed to create a routine scared me stiff, and I initially froze. Fortunately, I got over it quickly, and once I got flowing I even made myself laugh when writing my ‘Star Wars and Sustainability’ comedy routine, as it did for those watching its first performances, including the paying gigs.
 
There is a revolution happening
Whilst a mini-revolution has happened in my career, with me unexpectedly adding writer and entertainer to my CV, the far more important revolution has happened in sustainability. To name just two recent game changers, the UN launched the Sustainable Development Goals, and the Paris Agreement was ratified. The most significant transformation for me though is in renewables, with them now making up half of net electricity capacity added last year.  
 
This didn’t happen because people ‘believed’ they needed to change, mainly it was because countless individuals and organisations took action. My intention is continue taking action to be part of the revolution. 
 
* Mike: I know that Plan A has been delivered by a myriad of people, but as you’ve been such a shining light for our industry and to me personally (thanks once again for hosting my business breakfast at M&S HQ in 2010, and writing the Empower Change testimonial in 2015), that I hope you don’t mind me focusing on you?!
** Just F**king Do It
 
Adam Woodhall is a writer, facilitator, connector and consultant. He has been in sustainability for 10 years working with dozens of organisations and thousands of individuals supporting them to become environmentally, socially and financially sustainable. He is also the author of the well-received guide, 'Empower Change'. Over the last 10 years he has worked with over sixty organisations, including PwC, HS1, Wessex Water, Network Rail, The Jockey Club, University of Westminster, Warburtons Bakery, First Direct Bank, NFU Mutual Insurance, Aegis Media, NG Bailey Construction, East Riding NHS, Parcelforce, Southern Railway, Allianz Insurance, Royal Mail, Go-Ahead Group and Pannone Law.
 
 
Prime
Off
Newsletter Sent
Off

3p Weekend: 10 Food Companies Going Fair Trade

3P Author ID
8779
Primary Category
Content

With a busy week behind you and the weekend within reach, there’s no shame in taking things a bit easy on Friday afternoon. With this in mind, every Friday TriplePundit will give you a fun, easy read on a topic you care about. So, take a break from those endless email threads, and spend five minutes catching up on the latest trends in sustainability and business.

In response to growing consumer demand, food companies around the world are becoming more transparent about their ingredients and supply chains. There's surely no shortage of food labels and third-party certifications for them to tap along the way. Since October is Fair Trade Month, this week we tip our hats to major food and grocery companies making a shift to ethical sourcing. Did your favorite brand make the list?

1. Marks and Spencer


Marks & Spencer launched its Plan A policy back in 2007. The 100-point plan helped transform the company’s supply chain and operations -- including even more ethical sourcing.

In 2014, the U.K. grocer released an encouraging progress update on its 2020 Plan A goals: Over 60 percent of the products sold in M&S stores had some type of sustainability attribute. This includes fair trade, organic, free-range, cruelty-free, low alcohol, responsible supply chain, recycled, or made in a factory where workers and the environment are respected, according to the company.

On the fair trade front, the company is leading even more: M&S was the first major retailer to switch all of its tea and coffee to fair trade back in 2006. It also sells fair trade wine, chocolate and flowers.

2. Kashi


Earlier this year, Kellogg subsidiary Kashi — known best for cereals and snack bars — made waves for its choice to establish a transitional organic label. It takes three years to earn the coveted organic certification, during which time farmers spend money to change their practices without getting a higher premium for their products.

In partnership with Quality Assurance International (QAI) and Hesco, Kashi's Certified Transitional label seeks to bridge the gap. In July, Kashi released its first product containing Certified Transitional ingredients — a sweet breakfast cereal fittingly called Dark Cocoa Karma Shredded Wheat Biscuits.

The whole wheat cereal is also one of the company's first products to contain cocoa certified by Fair Trade USA. Kashi first began selling Fair Trade Certified products last year, and now a variety of its cereals and snack bars bear the label.

3. Honest Tea


Okay, so this company isn't exactly going fair trade -- it's already there. It was the first company to market Fair Trade Certified bottled tea. But its commitment to translating increased revenues into more fair trade purchases should surely be commended.

Some were wary when Coca-Cola purchased the company in 2011, but Honest Tea remains an independent operating unit within the beverage behemoth. Thanks to higher distribution, the company grew by an enviable 30 percent between 2011 and 2015. It was able to purchase more organic products — 6.7 million pounds in 2014 — and ramp up its commitment to fair trade. Fair trade premiums paid by Honest Tea now total over $200,000 annually.

4. Ben & Jerry's


When it comes to leaders in fair trade, look no further than Ben & Jerry's. The beloved brand became the first ice cream maker to use fair trade ingredients back in 2005. In 2010, it decided to go entirely fair trade -- across all flavors and in all markets.

In partnership with Fair Trade International, the company ensured "every possible ingredient" was Fair Trade Certified by 2011 in Europe. It did the same in the U.S. in 2014. Last year, Ben & Jerry's paid almost $2 million in social premiums to farmers producing its five fair trade ingredients: sugar, cocoa, vanilla, coffee and bananas.

5. Keurig Green Mountain


No matter how you feel about those single-use coffee pods, it's encouraging to know that Keurig Green Mountain is making steps toward more ethical sourcing.

Green Mountain Coffee Roasters began to source fair trade coffee in 2000, six years before it purchased a 65 percent stake in Keurig for a reported $104.3 million. In 2010, it was named the world's largest purchaser of fair trade coffee, and the company continues to work with Fair Trade USA on ethical coffee pilots around the world.

6. Starbucks


Starbucks is no stranger to the fair trade game. The coffee chain committed to sourcing its coffee ethically back in 2008. This includes adhering to its internal C.A.F.E. (Coffee and Farmer Equity) Practices, developed in collaboration with Conservation International, as well as fair trade standards.

All of its practices are audited by third parties. And by 2014, 96 percent of Starbucks coffee passed the C.A.F.E. and fair trade muster. Last year, the company sourced 100 percent of its coffee ethically.

7. Whole Foods


It's probably no surprise to see Whole Foods Market on this list. But in addition to stocking a bevy of fair trade products from other labels, the renowned natural grocer is also sourcing more ethical ingredients for its private label, 365 Everyday Value. The company partners with Fair Trade USA to certify ingredients such as cocoa and sugar.

8. Chick-fil-A


At the 2015 Sustainable Brands conference in San Diego, sustainability professionals were introduced to Thrive Coffee -- a coffee brand that returns as much as 75 percent of revenues directly to farmers.

As 3p's Jen Boynton noted last year, Thrive's first major partner -- Chick-fil-A -- came as a bit of a surprise to those familiar with the firm’s stance on gay marriage. But a year later and the partnership is still going strong. Chick-fil-A touts its Thrive brews as 'coffee with a story,' and the collaboration allowed Thrive to significantly expand its reach -- meaning more work and more wages for coffee farmers in Latin America.

9. Safeway


Last year, Safeway and Fair Trade USA linked up to bring Fair Trade Certified seafood to North America. The grocery chain first offered fair trade yellowfin tuna to shoppers in the American Northwest. And Safeway ultimately hopes to ensure sustainable sourcing for all fresh and frozen seafood. It's now working with the California nonprofit FishWise to assess its entire seafood supply chain.

10. Nutiva


Known for its hempseed and coconut oil products (and its organic version of a Nutella-esque hazelnut spread), Nutiva is making strides toward fair trade purchasing. Its red palm products are certified by Fair for Life. And it began certifying some of its coconut oil products with Fair Trade USA in 2014.

Image credit: Honest Tea

3P ID
251192
Prime
Off

Seventh Generation Settles Class-Action Lawsuit Over 'Natural' Claims

3P Author ID
367
Primary Category
Content

After almost two years of litigation, Seventh Generation reportedly agreed to pay a $4.5 million settlement over allegations that it deceptively marketed, labeled, and promoted its cleaning and personal care products as 'natural.'

The case, which was settled before it went to trial at courts in California and New York, stemmed in part from the fact that Seventh Generation admitted in a document on its website that it used synthetic ingredients in several products. Those substances include glycerin, sodium citrate and sodium hydroxide. The plaintiffs who filed the lawsuit alleged that by describing its products as “natural,” the company deceived customers into paying a premium for goods such as dish soap, surface cleaners and laundry detergent.

This summer, the Vermont-based company unsuccessfully argued for the cases to be dismissed. When those attempts failed, the company agreed to pay a settlement after a year of negotiations.

Seventh Generation also said it would remove labels such as 'all natural' and '100 percent natural' from its packaging. It will also clarify how it defines terms such as 'hypoallergenic' and 'nontoxic.' Plaintiffs suing the company claim the use of chemicals such as methylisothiazolinone and benzisothiazolinone, which are antimicrobial preservatives, further confused customers.

Clearly wanting to sweep this controversy under the carpet, at press time Seventh Generation made no mention of the settlement by press release.

Seventh Generation's competitors have challenged the veracity of its products’ safety for years. In 2010, the consumer packaged goods (CPG) giant Procter & Gamble accused the company of making false claims that its products lacked any harmful ingredients and were completely natural. As a result, Seventh Generation removed a video, which also asserted that P&G’s brands posed risks to consumers, from its website.

Ironically, Seventh’s Generation’s enduring success has proven to become one of many thorns in P&G’s side as investors become increasingly worried about the Cincinnati-based company’s financial performance. As Bloomberg reported this month, companies including Tom’s of Maine, Method Home and the Honest Co. – all of which were nailed for 'natural' claims – contributed to P&G’s recent woes as more consumers want more sustainable products. Many of these smaller companies’ products are now mainstream and readily available in retailers such as Target, Walmart and Costco.

Meanwhile, Unilever has proven adept at identifying niche companies that can add value to its portfolio. Starting with Dollar Shave Club, the Anglo-Dutch conglomerate is on a spending spree that included an interest in the Honest Co. before its September announcement that it would acquire Seventh Generation. Hence the eventual decision for Seventh Generation to settle its litigation in order to maximize its going price, which was reportedly an estimated $700 million.

Seventh Generation joins a long list of companies targeted for making 'natural' claims that many consumer groups find nebulous. Six years ago, Unilever’s Ben & Jerry’s agreed to remove 'natural' from its colorful and cartoonish ice cream cartons. PepsiCo, another example of a multinational buying more niche and healthy brands, removed 'all natural' from its Naked Juice bottles after mounting complaints. This roster also includes the likes of Trader Joe’s, which was called out for listing ingredients such as evaporated cane juice (fancy speak for sugar) on its private-label food products.

The lesson for all companies here is that any and all claims about their ingredients’ safety and origin must be watertight – or else these brands risk becoming ensnared in a social media frenzy or, even worse, costly litigation. To do otherwise ignores market realities. After all, products such as those labeled 'organic' began to thrive not because of proven science, but because of exaggerated worries over conventional products.

On that point, claims about so-called “dangerous” ingredients, such as methylisothiazolinone, are made by organizations such as the Environmental Working Group (which currently urges visitors to its site to first consider making a donation) are not made to protect consumers. And their fundraising models are often dependent on appealing to consumers’ worst fears. In turn, those worries fuel donations that allow this cycle to continue. Meanwhile, many consumers are still confused and do not know which brands to trust. CPG companies must decide whether they want to make exhaustive claims that their products are safe, or just eliminate them entirely.

So, if you are still puzzled over whether you should buy cleaning products from the likes of Seventh Generation or those branded by P&G or Colgate-Palmolive, there is a middle ground: Clean your house with a 5 percent white vinegar solution. Unless, of course, you are gluten intolerant.

Image credit: Seventh Generation

3P ID
251109
Prime
Off