Search

One in three disabled jobseekers in UK face discrimination

Primary Category
Content

Up to 37% of disabled jobseekers have been discriminated against during the recruitment process according to research commissioned by the Recruitment Industry Disability Initiative (RIDI).

There is also a significant disparity between the perceptions of candidates and recruiters in terms of the provision of ‘reasonable adjustments’ made to accommodate disabled jobseekers – a legal requirement under the Equality Act 2010. Despite the fact that 82% of recruiters claim reasonable adjustments are made to cater for disabled jobseekers, 58% of those candidates say that no such adjustments were made.??

Kate Headley, director of consulting at the Clear Company, a diversity consultancy which conducted the survey on behalf of RIDI, commented: “When around one in every 18 jobseekers has a disability this inevitably means that employers are missing out on a rich pool of talent.”
 

Prime
Off
Newsletter Sent
Off

TD Continues Green Strategy with the First Bank-led Green Bond in Canada

Primary Category
Content

Submitted by Reynard Loki

This is the most recent article in our series on Sustainable Finance. For more articles, go to http://www.csrwire.com/blog/series/69-sustainable-finance-special-focus/posts.

Last year, TD Bank Group (TD) became the first Canadian commercial lender to sell a green bond, offering a CND $500 million (USD $454 million) debt security to raise capital to fund specific environmental initiatives. The three-year bond has a maturity date of April 3, 2017, with the proceeds used exclusively for green initiatives funded in Canada. 

For SRI investors, this is welcome news. But perhaps not so surprising, considering that TD has made green initiatives a cornerstone of their business strategy. By the end of 2014, TD had 140 LEED certified locations in North America and more than 110 facilities generating solar energy. In addition, they have branches designed to be net zero energy.

With their green bond, TD is entering a rapidly growing market that is estimated to be anywhere between USD $10 billion and $346 billion.{1}

I had a chance to ask Karen Clarke-Whistler, TD's Chief Environment Officer, some questions about TD's green bond, how it fits into TD's overall green strategy and the green bond climate in Canada— Reynard Loki

There are several definitions for "green bond" out there. How does TD define it?

You're right, there are quite a few definitions. The reality is that right now, people have to develop their own definitions. We say that with a green bond, the proceeds will contribute to a low carbon economy. There are three ways the proceeds will be used: renewables, energy efficiency/green buildings and green infrastructure, which will be primarily public transit support. To back that up, we have worked with the Canadian Standards Association to build out criteria for each of those three categories, so it makes it pretty easy for us to say if something is in or out. Our auditor Ernst & Young will be assuring the use of proceeds.

How is the green bond pricing different from a standard bond?

The pricing was flat to the standard issue bond. In fact, on the same day we issued a vanilla five-year bond because we wanted to see what the spread would be, if any, and in fact, there was no spread in pricing. So the pricing was flat relative to our standard bond.

How does the green bond issue fit into TD's overall interest in supporting environmental projects?

It's absolutely a part of it. The starting point for us is that we are a carbon neutral bank. We became carbon neutral in 2009 and we have used that commitment to low carbon and energy efficiency to build out a very broad strategy. We started by learning about our own buildings—we have over 2000 of them. We learned how to be energy-efficient, purchased lots of renewable energy credits and have some net zero branches. So the green bond is really part and parcel of our overall strategy, which we've been building up over the last five years.

How has that strategy translated into the capital markets?

When we'd gained a deep understanding of how the energy efficiency and low carbon technologies we were using worked, we were able to walk that across to our financing group and say, "Hey guys, we know you think this stuff is crazy and risky, but it's not." I'm going back to 2009–2010 here, and they were able to actually get quite a lead in the Canadian market and in financing renewables. We were able to be the first bank out of the gate on the Ontario microFIT Program, which is similar to the German program for residential and small business.{2} So we are able to create a term loan product for that program before any other bank. We've been aggressively going after high-quality renewables, low-carbon type projects, so really the green bond is the next step. We wanted to demonstrate to the capital market that this is a vibrant part of the economy; it's not just comprised of startups that are high-risk. There are some serious players in this and a big funnel of projects, and it's here to stay.

How much of these proceeds are going to be used in refinancing versus financing new projects?

It includes both, actually. Our starting point was that everything financed by the green bond had to be no older than three months at the time we issued the bond. We basically did that to coincide with the beginning of our 2014 fiscal year. The bond is now completely filled, but what happens, of course, is that projects come in that are loans and then, as the loan is retired, you've got to top up. So it is a continuous cycle of refinancing, but our starting point was to attract new business to the bank and not retread what we already have in there, because honestly, that could've been done the next day. So it's been an interesting journey. I think now that we understand the fund a little bit better and we've been able to demonstrate internally that we can be a bit more innovative with some of the projects that will now be coming into the funnel. 

How do you view the overall green bond space in Canada?

There's a lot of activity in Canada. The government of Ontario just issued a green bond, which was great to see and I know there are lots of other entities that are looking to issue green bonds. The reality is that there are a lot of great potential projects around Canada because we have a very green source of electricity. We've got lots of hydroelectric, wind and solar activity that is quite apart from public infrastructure and green buildings, so I fully expect to see more green bonds issued. I know all of the banks are very active in underwriting green bonds, which is kind of a first step to see how it goes. So I expect to see lots more activity in Canada and North America over the next year or two.

TD has signed on to the Green Bond Principles, which offer an excellent guide to the market, but remain voluntary. What is the impact of the lack of legally enforceable green bond standards? 

The green bond principles are voluntary but they are quite comprehensive. I do see that over time, this market is going to settle in, and that there will be standards or standards-like protocols developed. We see lots of activity in the consulting world and all sorts of different groups. Barclay's MSCI has put its own sort of guidance around what would be expected in its Green Bond Index. I think the market will drive towards more consistency, but right now it's such early days. I'd like to see the opportunity for this market to have a little bit of flexibility in it. I don't think we've even begun to see some of the innovation that could occur  through this and to kind of try to absolutely tighten it down right away. And anybody who's issuing green bonds is looking at what the last person does and is trying to up the ante, so the competition is great. I don't think that many people are going to get away with greenwashing because there are too many people like us who are going to call them on it. Let's let the market mature a little bit before we try to clamp down on it. 

What are the different barometers and performance metrics you use to evaluate the bond?

For us, a measure of success is demonstrating leadership in the environment because it is a differentiator for us. It's part of our goal. Our investment team would say diversification of investors. We had 12 investors who were new to TD. So of the 39 investors in the bond, a third were new to TD. They could have invested in a vanilla bond. That was of interest to us. There were a number of SRI investors, but there were also a number of mainstream investors. Obviously, we want to attract the SRI market: TD is the biggest Canadian bank destination for SRI investors. But I'm interested to see mainstream investors coming into this as well.

Are they all institutional investors and how can an individual investor get in?

Yes, the initial offering was an institutional offering. Now a lot of those, like BlackRock and of course, TD, will be selling those off on the secondary market to individual investors as part of mutual fund packages.

Does TD have any plans to issue more green bonds?

There is no concrete plan right now, but we recently identified that there is no barrier for us to issue another green bond. So it really comes down to when we need to raise money. We are quite well capitalized now and you may not want to just repeat the same thing again. You may want to look at a green bond in a different currency, for example. So we're totally open to it. We feel very confident that we've got a great funnel of projects that can go into it and are looking forward to seeing how this space evolves.

Full disclosure: I have been a happy TD customer for years. At my branch in Manhattan, for a little while, they created a beautiful mini-forest, complete with tree, grass and foliage in the little outside area where they have the ATM machines. There was also an interactive touch screen window where people could learn about the environment. 

That's great to hear! That was our program called the "A-Tree-M," which was part of our great partnership with Bette Midler's New York Restoration Project. TD is a lead sponsor of NYRP's MillionTreesNYC, and the millionth tree is actually going to be planted this autumn.

 This is the most recent article in our series on Sustainable Finance. For more articles, go to http://www.csrwire.com/blog/series/69-sustainable-finance-special-focus/posts.

NOTES
1. Green Bonds: Victory Bonds for the environment. TD Economics. November 1, 2013. http://www.td.com/document/PDF/economics/special/GreenBonds_Canada.pdf
2. In 1990, the German government passed the Electricity Feed-in Law, which supported various renewable energy projects, including microgeneration, through a feed‐in tariff. (See Dawn Strifler, "Small Scale, Big Impact: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Ontario’s microFIT Program." July 31, 2012. http://sei.info.yorku.ca/files/2012/12/120905-MRP-Final.pdf).

Prime
Off
Newsletter Sent
Off

3p Weekend: The Best (Cause Marketing) Super Bowl Ads of All Time

3P Author ID
8779
Primary Category
Content

With a busy week behind you and the weekend within reach, there’s no shame in taking things a bit easy on Friday afternoon. With this in mind, every Friday TriplePundit will give you a fun, easy read on a topic you care about. So, take a break from those endless email threads, and spend five minutes catching up on the latest trends in sustainability and business.

The perennial frenzy over Super Bowl ads is upon us. As we gear up for the biggest game of the year, it always seems like half the viewers are more excited about the commercials than anything else. So, before we turn on our TVs this Sunday, let's take a moment to recognize companies that used their million-dollar ad spots for something bigger than themselves. Grab a tissue, you may need it.

1. Bank of America, "U2 'Invisible'"


U2 frontman Bono has long been an advocate for HIV/AIDS awareness, and during last year's Super Bowl, he teamed up with Bank of America to bring the cause to the national stage. For 24 hours after the spot aired, viewers were offered a free iTunes download of U2's "Invisible." For each download, Bank of America donated $1 to help end mother-to-child transmission of HIV. The project yielded more than 3 million downloads -- and more than $3 million for Project (RED).

2. Chevrolet, "Life -- #PurpleYourProfile"


Another hit from last year's Super Bowl, this Chevy ad celebrates cancer survivors and those still doing battle with the disease. It connected to the automaker's #PurpleYourProfile social media campaign, which called on viewers to turn their Facebook and Twitter profile pictures purple in honor of World Cancer Day. Chevrolet contributed $1 to the American Cancer Society for every purple profile and raised its max of $1 million during the campaign.

3. Intuit's #TeamSmallBiz and GoldieBlox


Last year, Intuit launched its #TeamSmallBiz campaign to bring a small business to the big stage for the first time. Users voted, and GoldieBlox -- which creates engineering toys "made for girls" -- came out victorious, with funding from Intuit to create an ad spot for the big game. The company's commercial during last year's Super Bowl did not disappoint. We could practically hear all the young girls of America tossing their dollies out the window.

4. Bud Light, "Rescue Dog Weego"


This cute and clever cause marketing campaign aired during Super Bowl XLVI in 2012. It tied into a Facebook campaign on Bud Light's page, which rewarded each like with a $1 donation to Tony LaRussa's Animal Rescue Foundation. The campaign raised $250,000 to support animal rescue.

5. Budweiser, "A Hero's Welcome"


A group of veterans in Winter Park, Florida, wanted to give a local soldier "the loving welcome home that they never received," Business Insider reported before this ad spot aired during last year's Super Bowl. With the help of Budweiser, they gave 24-year-old Lt. Chuck Nad a "hero's welcome." The tear-jerking ad hit home with viewers, and millions participated in Budweiser's #Salute social media campaign, which encouraged consumers to honor our veterans.

6. Chipotle, "Back to the Start"


Back in 2012, Chipotle landed its first national ad spot during the Super Bowl. The company used the opportunity to present its sustainable philosophy in a two-minute film. The haunting ad, which features Coldplay's "The Scientist," was ahead of its time and surely stood out from amped-up ads for processed snack foods. After drying their tears (admit it, you welled up there in the middle), viewers were encouraged to download the short film on iTunes, with proceeds benefiting the Chipotle Cultivation Foundation.

Sneak Preview: Always, "#LikeAGirl" for Super Bowl XLIX


Get ready for all the feels. But look at it this way: If you watch it now, you (probably) won't start welling up when your friends are over for the big game.

Editor's Note: A representative from Chipotle contacted TriplePundit to inform us that its "Back to the Start" ad campaign launched during the 2012 Grammy Awards, not the Super Bowl. We still like the ad, though, and stand by its position as a trend-setter that helped bring cause marketing to the mainstream.

Image credit: Flickr/tripletri

Mary Mazzoni is the Senior Editor of TriplePundit. You can follow her on Twitter @mary_mazzoni

3P ID
202191
Prime
Off

Keurig Helps Farmers Cope with 'Coffee Rust'

3P Author ID
95
Primary Category
Content

La Roya -- to an untrained ear those words almost sound like a new blend of premium coffee. Far from it.

"The rust” is shorthand for coffee leaf rust or Hemileia vastatrix, a devastating fungus that attacks coffee plants and often threatens the plants' survival.

Fungal spores first show on an infected plant as yellowish-brown spots on the underside of coffee leaves, eventually turning rust-colored red. As the disease progresses, infected leaves fall off the plant. If left untreated, the fungus chokes off the plant by leaving it unable to photosynthesize.

First discovered in East Africa in 1861, coffee leaf rust destroyed the crop on the island of Ceylon, now Sri Lanka, and is credited as one of the reasons the British drink tea. The disease soon spread to Southeast Asia and coffee-growing regions in south, central and western Africa. La Roya finally reached the western hemisphere in 1970, when an outbreak was discovered in Bahia, Brazil. Coffee leaf rust is now found in every coffee-growing region in the world.

Despite its global spread, coffee rust has typically been manageable and controllable, if still a serious nuisance. When treated quickly, otherwise healthy plants in good soil can survive the disease. Nonetheless, the U.S. Department of State considers the current outbreak of La Roya as the worst ever seen in Central America, Mexico and the Caribbean. Losses have topped $1 billion, costing hundreds of thousands of jobs and forcing many to abandon the coffee-farming life altogether in search of a better life elsewhere.

“In some years it’s worse than others and in some geographies it’s worse than others,” says Lindsey Bolger, VP of coffee sourcing and excellence for Keurig Green Mountain. “We have seen an entire population of coffee obliterated, truly destroyed and wiped out by this particular disease.” Never has the disease been "quite as impactful in terms of coffee production and coffee farmer livelihood.”

Over the last couple of years, coffee rust has threatened the livelihoods of up to 14 million people. What is different this time? Why has leaf rust taken such a toll on an entire coffee growing region?

Migrating microbes, coffee prices and soil health


Climate change is already pushing many pests and diseases into higher elevations, including hemileia vastatrix -- La Roya is on the move. Rising temperatures, particularly rising minimum nighttime temperatures, heavy rainfall and increased humidity all contribute to the fungus reaching "further and further up into higher elevations where it was relatively unknown,” Bolger says.

According to the nonprofit social investment fund Root Capital, 80 percent of the world coffee supply comes from small farms, or 25 million farmers that depend on coffee for their livelihoods.

There is little buffer insulating a small-scale farmer from the vagaries of the world coffee market. Low coffee prices threaten the ability of small farmers to feed their families, let alone maintain optimal conditions for their plants. The inherent risk of the episodic rise and fall of prices is reinforced by the increasing cost of “inputs,” explains Bolger. A “higher cost of labor, higher cost of fertilizers, fuels and other tools that farmers [need] to really stay on top of good farm management."

"Low coffee prices really challenged farmers’ ability to maintain good soil health and good plant health in the years prior to this outbreak,” says Bolger. Without regular inputs of phosphorous, nitrogen and other nutrients, “The soil becomes depleted," she says. "The plants therefore become weakened and more susceptible to the standard list of challenges and diseases. Then suddenly there’s a high frequency of these rust spores in that particular area, and the plant easily becomes just overwhelmed and is no longer able to defend itself.”

As low market prices and higher costs gnawed away at income, soil health slipped into a slow protracted decline -- making an effective response to coffee rust even more difficult.

“While the evidence of soil depletion and coffee plant health was perhaps less visible in the previous three of four years,” Bolger says. "The real indicator of how weakened the plants were really surfaced as a function of this rust outbreak."

Mix a slump in commodity prices, depleted soil and climate change, and you have the makings of a La Roya outbreak more devastating than any since its discovery in the 19th century. That "bottomless" cup of coffee most of us enjoy, to the tune of about 1.6 billion cups every day, depends on how well small farmers cope with these converging challenges.

A resilient supply chain -- from coffee plant to coffee cup -- begins with healthy plants, good soil and a thriving farming community that's resilient to climate change.

Laying a resilient foundation with Fair Trade

Fair Trade is an important component of supply chain resiliency, providing more income and better access to essential services for participating farmers.  “It’s through the Fair Trade model that we've been able to activate our interest in and act on our concern for coffee farmers,” Bolger says. "Because we have a preexisting network that gives us access to thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of coffee farming families who are within our Fair Trade network, we can very quickly engage and respond in a way that is most appropriate and effective."

When coffee prices bottomed out, "we saw that those who had engaged with us through Fair Trade were much better able to address the challenges they were facing,” says Bolger's colleague, Colleen Popkin, senior manager of sustainability, who is responsible for Keurig's Coffee Supply Chain Outreach.

“So we saw that Fair Trade farmers were more resilient than those in the conventional supply chain. But we believe we really need to go beyond Fair Trade in terms of the support because the challenges [the farmers] are facing are so severe.”

Beyond Fair Trade


The Fair Trade model works, but it isn't perfect. It doesn't reach all farmers or always offer a complete solution for those who do benefit from it. Bolger explains that “… Oftentimes it doesn't address the entire cost of not only good farm management, but reinvestment in soil and plant health [and] investment in coffee community and family wellbeing. There is often a gap."

A more comprehensive system of outreach to rebuild and maintain thriving farming communities is built on the spirit and success of Fair Trade through new programs and relationships. Going "beyond Fair Trade" requires commitment and cooperation among all stakeholders -- from farmers to industry, NGOs, research organizations and government.

Triple bottom line: In it for the long haul


A key principle of triple-bottom-line thinking is understanding the broad scope and long-term view of sustainable business. In the coffee business, it means responding to the immediate needs of farmers while considering the health and resilience of the environment, in order to sustain those farms and communities for the long term.

Keurig defines its commitment to this broad and long view of sustaining its supply chain:

"The agricultural communities within our supply chains face a daunting set of interconnected challenges, including limited access to food, clean water, health care, education and alternative economic opportunities. Our broad-scale, holistic outreach efforts cover a wide range of needs. We offer immediate aid for disaster relief and recovery, such as providing support for rebuilding after a natural disaster. But we also look beyond the farm to fund longer-term community development that enables resiliency in the face of complex social and environmental challenges."

In keeping with this commitment, Keurig expanded its outreach programs “... that invest in our supply chain for the long-term supply of sustainably grown coffee, and also for the quality of life and livelihoods of farmers," says Popkin. "And there have been several programs that we supported through that fund to help build resilience of coffee farmers in our supply chain, especially to address La Roya.”

Coffee Farmer Resilience Initiative


Also in 2013, the Coffee Farmer Resilience Initiative launched in partnership with Root Capital, the Skoll Foundation and the Inter-American Development Bank. Keurig provided $1.9 million of the initial $7 million program.

The Coffee Farmer Resilience Initiative supports farmers through local, on-the-ground cooperatives by allowing them means to provide expanded services, "especially credit for long-term, renovation loans which are traditionally risky for social lenders." Popkin explains.

"With the changing climate in this region, it’s difficult to provide agricultural loans on a long-term basis. So, this initiative allowed Root Capital some guarantees to be able to unlock capital to lend to farming organizations that could then lend to their members to rehabilitate and renovate their coffee farms."

The initiative has grown significantly since its launch. And the effort to ensure a resilient coffee supply chain attracted more organizations ready to help, including the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Starbucks and Cooperative Coffees.  Root Capital reports that, as of 2014, the fund has grown to $23 million, supporting an estimated 40,000 coffee farmers in the region.

Working with farmers: Adapt, mitigate, engage


Keurig takes a hands-on approach to supply chain resiliency efforts that goes beyond financial investments. Part of the foundation of this effort is the Climate Change Policy that guides the company’s strategy to address the changing climate that has made coffee rust an increasingly difficult challenge for farmers. This policy includes three primary components: adaptation, mitigation and engagement:

Adaptation.  "The greatest climate change risk we face relates to the impact on our agricultural products and the communities in which they are produced," the company said. Therefore, the company pledged to:


  • Integrate adaptation tactics into its sourcing guidelines

  • Support industry standards that address climate change mitigation and adaptation practices

  • Provide adaptation and resilience training for its farmers to improve yields, optimize water use, diversify crops and adjust to changing local weather conditions

  • Invest in research to develop different varieties of coffee plants that are better suited for changing climate and weather conditions

  • Integrate climate change adaptation with ongoing efforts to improve livelihoods among its farmers and farming communities
Mitigation.  "Reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions throughout our value chain benefits our bottom line and contributes to the shared effort to reduce climate change risks," the company said. It pledged to:

  • Develop a full understanding of the greenhouse gas emissions across its entire value chain, from farm and factory, to operations and logistics, to product use, to product end of life/disposal/recycling

  • Continuously reduce greenhouse gas emissions across its value chain, focusing most effort and investment where the opportunity for emissions reduction is greatest
Engagement.  "Working collaboratively with others is the only way to have significant and lasting impact on climate change." The company pledged to:

  • Engage with governments to advance the establishment of public policies that encourage significant reductions in GHG emissions, improve resilience and support adaptation

  • Work with other companies in the food/beverage sector to align efforts, to maximize our collective impact

  • Collaborate with NGOs, leveraging their expertise and providing them with the resources they need to do their work

  • Communicate openly with stakeholders about progress and challenge

Supplier guidelines and 2020 supply chain goals


In 2007, Keurig developed the Responsible Sourcing Supplier Guidelines. These guidelines are designed  to strengthen the social and environmental role of Keurig's own operation, as well as the operations of its suppliers.

To support and further these guidelines, in 2012 Keurig announced an ambitious set of 2020 Resilient Supply Chain Goals, including:


  • Engage 1 million people in its manufacturing and agriculture supply chains to significantly improve their livelihoods

  • Source 100 percent of primary agricultural and manufactured products according to established Keurig Green Mountain Responsible Sourcing Guidelines
“Through our responsible sourcing program we’re building more traceability and transparency into those parts of our supply chain that are not Fair Trade, so we understand where that coffee is coming from and how we can support those farmers," said Popkin.

All of this effort, planning, collaboration and vision is how Keurig provides solutions that help keep farmers farming.

Sustained effort, long-term vision


When businesses like Starbucks, Keurig Green Mountain and others collaborate in an effort to help small coffee farmers succeed, it's the real deal -- not another greenwash campaign to look good environmentally, but with little or no real impact.

Led by companies such as Keurig, this industry-wide effort to adopt a comprehensive long-term framework of resiliency makes apparent the real potential of the triple bottom line in business. For the coffee industry there is little choice, as essential to a successful business as a positive P&L statement. Indeed, the time has come for all business and industry to adopt triple-bottom-line thinking, or move aside to let others lead the way into a sustainable future resilient to inevitable change.

Nobody would have wished such adversity on small coffee farmers, especially anyone involved in the coffee business. After all, you can't sell coffee without coffee beans. The devastation to thousands of families and their livelihoods is tragic. But, as Popkin explains, from tragedy comes the opportunity to build a path toward cooperation, partnership and, ultimately, resilience -- even in the face of climate change, disease and unpredictable market forces.

"It’s a broader, industry-wide effort and demonstrates an evolution in our response to these issues," says Popkin. "... We understand that we need to collaborate on a challenge that is as great as this latest coffee rust epidemic."

La Roya has dealt a hard blow in recent years. It is one more example of the very real and immediate impact of climate change. It has also galvanized the effort to mitigate, adapt, engage and join in a cooperative effort overcome the challenges ahead.

Images courtesy of Keurig and CIAT International Center for Tropical Agriculture via flickr

3P ID
199989
Prime
Off

MillerCoors Adds Solar Power to the Brew

3P Author ID
365
Primary Category
Content

MillerCoors has been working to reduce the impact of its operations from the start. Formed six years ago as a joint venture between SABMiller and Molson Coors, the company focuses on critical areas like water, energy consumption and emissions.

In its 2014 sustainability report, MillerCoors shows a greenhouse gas reduction of 15 percent over the previous year, and a reduction in energy consumption of 15.6 percent. Since 2009, the company has reduced the energy required to produce beer from 162 megajoules per hectoliter of beer to 123 MJ/hl. This year, it aims to reduce that number by an additional 15 percent. (For those not up on your conversions: A hectoliter is about 26 gallons, or a little less than two kegs of beer.)

The company is now a step closer to its energy goals with the announcement of a 3.2-megawatt solar array completed at its Irwindale, California, brewery.

“From heating our kettles to the packaging process, we rely on energy to brew our quality beers. Simply put, without energy there is no beer,” said Tom Long, MillerCoors CEO. “But we are acutely aware of the energy stress on this community, so we are doing our share – plus some – to decrease usage by installing this solar array. This step toward brewing more sustainably makes us a better brewer and a better neighbor to the residents of Los Angeles County.”

The project broke ground back in October. It consists of more than 10,000 solar panels, provided by SolarCity, installed across 10 acres of the brewery grounds.

Not only does the system generate electricity without producing any emissions, but it also helps reduce the load on the local grid during periods of high demand. The new MillerCoors solar array will produce enough energy to brew more than 7 million cases of beer annually. This is supplemented with a cogeneration system that was installed in 2011 that creates biogas from wastewater.  That system utilizes two GE Jenbacher engines fed from two anaerobic digesters that combine to produce an additional megawatt.

“Leveraging solar power helps ensure that we can continue brewing beer in California for years to come,” said Ben Maillette, MillerCoors Irwindale Brewery vice president. “MillerCoors has been a strong supporter of the San Gabriel Valley community for more than 50 years, and this project is the latest way we’re alleviating some of the environmental issues facing the region.”

The new solar array at the MillerCoors Irwindale Brewery is the largest solar photovoltaic system installed at any brewery in the U.S.

Solar power continues to gain momentum after adding a third of all new generation capacity last year. It is expected to grow faster than any other electricity source over the next two years and is projected to be the largest single source of electricity by 2050. The reason for all this optimism, according to a recent Bloomberg post, is “because it’s a technology, not a fuel.” As such, it can be expected to continue to become more efficient while decreasing in cost. That’s very different than fuels that tend to get more expensive as they get more scarce.

Image credit: marcantg18: Flickr Creative Commons

RP Siegel, PE, is an author, inventor and consultant. He has written for numerous publications ranging from Huffington Post to Mechanical Engineering. He and Roger Saillant co-wrote the successful eco-thriller Vapor Trails. RP, who is a regular contributor to Triple Pundit and Justmeans, sees it as his mission to help articulate and clarify the problems and challenges confronting our planet at this time, as well as the steadily emerging list of proposed solutions. His uniquely combined engineering and humanities background help to bring both global perspective and analytical detail to bear on the questions at hand.

Follow RP Siegel on Twitter.

3P ID
202138
Prime
Off

Photo Essay: A Look Inside Ontario, Canada’s Coal-to-Biomass Power Plant Conversion

3P Author ID
100
Primary Category
Content

Information provided by Ministry of Economic Development, Employment and Infrastructure (MEDEI)

Kicking the coal habit isn’t easy, but as Ontario, Canada has learned — the air is cleaner when it’s done. With the closing of the Thunder Bay Generating Station earlier this year, Ontario became the first jurisdiction in North America to fully eliminate coal as a source of electricity generation.

"Getting off coal is the single largest climate change initiative undertaken in North America and is equivalent to taking up to seven million cars off the road,” observed Ontario’s Minister of Energy, Bob Chiarelli. “We celebrate a cleaner future for our children and grandchildren while embracing the environmental benefits that our cleaner energy sources will bring."

A big part of transitioning away from coal is renovating power plants that were once coal-fired. One recent milestone: Ontario households recently began using energy generated by North America’s largest power plant fueled completely by biomass. Formerly a coal-burning facility in existence for more than 50 years, it is now a source of clean energy.

The station burned its last piece of coal in September 2012. Conversion of the station began in mid-2012 and included construction of two silos and boiler modifications to accommodate the biomass.

“The successful conversion of Atikokan to biomass will put Ontario on the world map as a leader in using this sustainable fuel source for electricity production,” Chiarelli added.

The coal-free energy mix now being burned at Atikokan will lead to a significant reduction in harmful emissions and, in turn, will result in cleaner air and a healthier environment. “Close to 100 percent of the electricity Ontario Power Generation produces is from sources that are virtually free of climate change- or smog-causing emissions,” added Tom Mitchell, president and CEO of Ontario Power Generation, which generates more than half of Ontario's power.

The biomass used to fuel the Atikokan Generating Station is being harvested and processed in Ontario. Domestic suppliers have leveraged this opportunity to secure contracts to provide pellets to international buyers.

Ontario Power Generation has contracts in place with two companies in northwestern Ontario to supply the wood pellets. Rentech and Resolute Forest Products Canada will each supply 45,000 tons of wood pellets annually.

Power when the grid needs it most


“Atikokan Generating Station is a unique addition to our clean energy portfolio as it provides dispatchable renewable energy that can be used when the power system needs it,” Mitchell added.

Thunder Bay Generating Station, operated by Ontario Power Generation, was the oldest coal-fired station in the province.  Like the Atikokan facility, the plant is being converted to burn advanced biomass, a renewable fuel source.

Ontario fulfilled its commitment to end coal generation in advance of its target of the end of 2014. A coal-free electricity supply mix has led to a significant reduction in harmful emissions, as well as cleaner air and a healthier environment.

For an inside look at the conversion of the Atikokan plant, check out the photo gallery below.

[gallery ids="202153,202154,202155,202156,202157,202158,202159"]

All images courtesy of the Ministry of Ontario

3P ID
202152
Prime
Off

Oregon Company Wants to Turn Recycled Water Into Beer

3P Author ID
367
Primary Category
Content

Would you drink a beer knowing it was made out of recycled sewage water? An Oregon company, Clean Water Services, wants to do exactly that and is petitioning the state’s Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to allow reuse of recycled water in alcoholic beverages.

The proposal kills two birds with one stone: Meet the growing demand for beer nationally and globally while dealing with the ongoing threat of water scarcity. As more municipalities struggle with providing water for their citizens, more government officials and citizens are getting over the “ick factor” of drinking water that in a past life may have been flushed down the toilet. San Diego has already given the green light to a long-term plan that will source a third of the city’s drinking water from recycled sources by 2035. Singapore, rich in just about every metric but lacking reliable supplies of water, has been recycling water for over a decade.

Meanwhile the popularity of microbrews on the domestic front, while the middle class has grown overseas, has translated to an increase in beer sales. If we as a society will continue to enjoy the products water makes possible, we will have to be open to new sources of water. And that includes water that has gone down the drain.

Last fall Clean Water Services sponsored a beer competition outside of Portland to demonstrate that the use of recycled water is fine for brewing beer. According to the company, the water provided to the competitors was so pure that brewers had to add their own minerals in order to achieve the taste and feel of their end product. At a higher level, the point of the competition was also to show recycled water is often purer and safer than other sources of municipal water. There is a message for beverage companies and breweries here: If they are going to expand or even maintain their businesses, tapping into conventional sources of municipal water may not always be possible.

Clean Water Service’s petition is currently in a public comment phase. The company is asking the DEQ to permit the use of recycled water in brewing beer as long as it is boiled, in addition to meeting or exceeding standards set by the National Water Research Institute. Oregon’s state health authority has already approved the company’s request, but DEQ insists it has “a high threshold for approving potable reuses of wastewater.” The 80+ pages accompanying this request are only for Clean Water Services to start making limited batches of beer for a pilot project — if a local brewer wanted to do the same, it would have to file its own request with the DEQ. As all that documentation shows, bureaucrats and much of society have a ways to go before they are over that ick factor.

The DEQ will accept written comments until Feb. 20, and a public hearing on Clean Water Services’ request will be held in Portland on Feb. 12.

Image credit: Visitor7

Based in California, Leon Kaye has also been featured in The Guardian, Clean Technica, Sustainable Brands, Earth911, Inhabitat, Architect Magazine and Wired.com. He shares his thoughts on his own site, GreenGoPost.com. Follow him on Twitter and Instagram.

3P ID
202115
Prime
Off

Tate Gallery Forced to Disclose Amount of BP Sponsorship

3P Author ID
367
Primary Category
Content

Should art institutions take money from oil companies? A core of activists in London have answered with an emphatic, "No." And they won a recent victory when the Tate Gallery in London was ordered by a court to disclose the amount of money the museum received from BP between 1990 to 2006. It turned out that BP’s annual contribution during those years was an average of £225,000 (US$340,000). Critics sneered at BP and the Tate, pointing out that it was barely distinguishable in the museum’s overall budget while the oil and gas giant received tons of exposure for its annual donation.

The disclosure, after a three-year legal fight, highlights the ongoing controversy over whether museums and cultural institutions should accept money from oil companies. Activist organizations such as Platform insist such grants such as those made by BP give these companies credibility that is largely undeserved. Then there is the other point of view, voiced by those including Guardian art critic Jonathan Jones, who downplays any benefits companies such as BP score by sponsoring the arts. During the Deepwater Horizon crisis, which was also during a time the arts were facing budget cuts throughout the United Kingdom, Jones defended galleries such as the Tate, writing, “If they can get money from Satan himself, they should take it.”

But for Platform and its allies, the acceptance of money from the likes of BP has far-reaching consequences. In addition to the climate change argument, these activists insist such sponsorships mean the Tate, National Portrait Gallery, the British Museum and the Royal Opera House are turning a blind eye to what they see as the devastating effects the oil and gas industry. The effects of tar sands extraction on native communities in Canada, the expansion of oil production in the Arctic and, of course, the negligence that resulted in the deaths at the Deepwater Horizon platform are all too important for museum administrators and boards to ignore. The fact that the Tate’s ethics committee declined to take any stance on BP’s sponsorship during the Gulf of Mexico fiasco, saying it was beyond the museum’s “charitable objectives,” in particular comes across to many as egregious.

Arts sponsorship, however, has long been supported by dubious sources — from the monarchies of centuries ago to the modern industries that have long stirred up controversy. Any cultural institution linked to the Rockefeller name has at minimum a faint tie to the oil industry. Detroit’s Institute of Arts, one of the best art museums in the U.S., exists in a large part thanks to the largess of the automobile sector. Art museums and temporary exhibits are often funded by companies and organizations with which anyone could find fault, from the commercial airliners based in the Middle East such as Emirates or Qatar Airways, to the giant beverage companies including Coca-Cola and PepsiCo.

For companies involved in the arts, it is about community involvement, branding and building relationships with governments and nonprofits. But to groups such as Platform, the oil companies’ impact on human rights and climate, as well as their influence on governments, is all the more reason for cultural organizations to stop taking their cash.

Which side are you on?

Image credit: Tate.org

Based in California, Leon Kaye has also been featured in The Guardian, Clean Technica, Sustainable Brands, Earth911, Inhabitat, Architect Magazine and Wired.com. He shares his thoughts on his own site, GreenGoPost.com. Follow him on Twitter and Instagram.

3P ID
202121
Prime
Off

Corporate Sustainability Practices for Small Manufacturing Firms

3P Author ID
8802
3P Special Series
Primary Category
Content

By Iris Picat

What exactly is corporate sustainability? Vestal Tutterow*, an alumnus of the Virginia Tech Executive Master of Natural Resources (XMNR) program, recently wrote a report that seeks to answer just this question. Part of Tutterow's capstone project, the report is based on a literature review and personal communications with managers.

It includes observations and recommendations intended to serve as a reference for anyone seeking an overview of corporate sustainability -- and the challenges and opportunities for embedding sustainability into small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the U.S.

He focused specifically on manufacturing firms in the report. Through this review, Tutterow found that the current standards, protocols and guidance available were generally designed for large organizations, and do not work well with SMEs due to their lack of resources to become proficient in the growing array of criteria, tools and reporting methods. Except for companies facing demands from customers, SMEs report having no internal or external incentives to begin addressing sustainability, and a lack of methods to readily quantify its value.

On the other hand, SMEs that embrace corporate sustainability see a number of benefits. Adopting corporate sustainability practices will often lead to cost savings through energy efficiency improvements, and new business opportunities through innovation. SMEs with sustainable practices in place are also more attractive to potential partners down the supply chain, notably the large multi-nationals and government agencies, which are increasingly expecting to see such practices already in place by potential suppliers and partners.

Research for this report also identified two promising mechanisms for engaging SME manufacturers. The first is through sustainable supply chain initiatives where large companies incentivize their SME suppliers to be more efficient and foster innovation. In some cases, the larger firms will even offer assistance through training, resources or mentoring. The second is through engaging “network organizations," such as sector-specific stakeholder groups. Organizations that already have built-in networking and communications in their sectors can help create resources and best practices for SMEs, along with a streamlined reporting protocol. Such a tailored approach can help minimize the weight SMEs currently feel at the sight of the corporate sustainability mountain.

For more details on current protocols and standards for reporting, best practices, current barriers, incentives and other pertinent information related to implementing sustainability practices into enterprises, please see Tutterow’s report, Embedding Sustainability into Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises.

Iris Picat is an alumna of Virginia Tech's Executive Master of Natural Resources program.

*Vestal Tutterow is an alumnus of the Virginia Tech Executive Master of Natural Resources (XMNR) program and graduated in May 2014. He works as a Senior Technical Consultant for Project Performance Company in VA, providing energy management services directly to manufacturers and through a voluntary U.S. Department of Energy initiative.  He is a registered Professional Engineer, a Certified Energy Manager, and a Certified Practitioner in Energy Management Systems.

3P ID
202017
Prime
Off

Signed, Sealed, Committed: Why We Signed the Ceres Climate Declaration

3P Author ID
100
Primary Category
Content

By Jim Weglewski

A signature seals a deal, backs a promise and commits you to action. Whether signing a receipt at a restaurant or closing on the mortgage of a new home, your signature is your bond. The commitment and responsibility connoted by a signature has been on the forefront of my mind as my company, Andersen Corp., recently signed on to the Climate Declaration.

Ceres created the Climate Declaration in 2013 as a way to accelerate the adoption of sustainable business practices in order to build a healthy global economy. Since then, more than 1,250 companies have signed on to show their support and belief that climate change is both the greatest challenge, and greatest opportunity, of our era.

In consideration of the broad-based acceptance of recent International Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) reports, and increasing evidence of current climate change impacts, Andersen is proud to join the ranks of leading companies that recognize the need for collaborative commitment as a powerful force of change in the face of deeply entrenched challenges.

Our commitment doesn’t end on the signature line. As a manufacturer of windows and doors, it is our responsibility to produce durable, energy efficient products that help our customers reduce energy consumption, lower utility costs and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

As a founding member of the U.S. Green Building Council, we've had a front-row seat to the amazing progress that can be achieved when multiple stakeholders sign on the dotted line and commit to solving complex challenges with a systems approach. As of October 2014, more than 3.3 billion square feet of building space were LEED certified. This achievement was only possible because leading businesses came together to drive change with measurable results.

But there is more work to be done. Buildings are still responsible for a significant proportion of global greenhouse gas emissions. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, residential and commercial buildings were responsible for 40 percent of U.S. energy consumption in 2013 – a figure that does not include the energy impacts associated with manufacturing, transporting or disposing of building products.

We are now faced with the challenge, and opportunity, of expanding access to green building strategies and products across all new construction and existing buildings. Net-zero buildings are now a reality, but only for a small, luxury segment of the market. Adding our signature to this declaration affirms our responsibility to provide durable, energy efficient products that are part of the solution.

Our signature also signifies a renewed commitment to “walk the talk” in our own operations. In support of that responsibility, Andersen has announced new corporate sustainability goals, committing to reducing solid waste, energy and water use by 20 percent per unit of product by 2020, using 2013 as a baseline.

We will also continue to collaborate with business leaders, governments and NGOs outside the building industry. It’s time we applied a “whole community” approach to advancing innovative solutions to systemic challenges.

Signing the Ceres Environmental Declaration is not a hollow gesture – for Andersen or the more than 1,250 companies that have also signed it. It not only carries commitment and responsibility, but also the promise of an era of prosperity and sustainable growth for leaders in all industries. We are ready to welcome you to the ranks – join us today.

Jim Weglewski is vice president of Corporate Quality, Sustainability and Facilities for Andersen Corporation.

3P ID
202130
Prime
Off