Search

On the heels of  the administration’s release of the Third National Climate Assessment report, President Barack Obama today announced an array of executive actions and public and private sector commitments to increase solar installations and energy efficiency improvements, strengthen energy efficiency standards, and bolster the solar industry workforce. The actions and pledges that Obama laid out will deploy enough solar energy to power nearly 130,000 homes, cut carbon emissions by the equivalent of taking 80 million cars off the road and save businesses $26 billion on their energy bills, the White House said in a statement.

“We don’t look backwards. We look forward. We don’t fear the future,” Obama said on why it’s time to conserve energy, promote renewables and take action on climate change.

Speaking at a Walmart store in Mountain View, Calif., Obama said that more than 300 public agencies, multifamily and affordable housing organizations, rural electric cooperatives, and businesses like Home Depot, Ikea, Google, Wal-mart and Goldman Sachs have signed on to install solar panels – representing a total of 850 megawatts of solar energy. Twenty-five public agencies, multifamily housing organizations, businesses and manufacturers are also joining the president’s Better Building Challenge, pledging to increase the energy efficiency of more than 1 billion square feet of their buildings – an area the size of 17,000 football fields -- by at least 20 percent by 2020.

To help build the growing green economy, the Department of Energy (DOE) will launch community college programs across the U.S. to train 50,000 workers to enter the solar industry by 2020, Obama said, building on the DOE’s Solar Instructor Training Network of almost 400 community colleges in 49 states that have provided solar workforce training for over 22,000 students since 2010.

Recognizing that energy efficiency is the most cost-effective form of energy, the president also announced plans to invest $2 billion in energy efficiency upgrades to federal buildings over the next three years. Combined with a similar $2 billion commitment to federal energy efficiency improvements in 2011, the administration is now on track to offer $4 billion in energy efficiency performance contracts through 2016, which will create, according to independent studies, tens of thousands of new construction jobs, the White House said in a statement. The additional $2 billion commitment will not come out of taxpayers’ pockets, according to the White House: The administration plans to pay for the upfront cost of projects with the savings realized from previous energy efficiency upgrades.

Also today, the DOE publicized its two new energy efficiency standards for commercial walk-in cooler and freezers, like the ones used to display milk and other refrigerated items in grocery stores, and for electric motors used to power devices such as conveyor belts and escalators. In addition to saving businesses money, these new regulations will cut greenhouse gas emissions by about 158 million metric tons through 2030 – the equivalent of the annual electricity use of more than 21 million U.S. homes. These two new standards, along with the five other standards issued under the Obama administration, will help the country achieve 70 percent of Obama’s goal to reduce carbon emissions by at least 3 billion metric tons by 2030, according to a White House statement.

The DOE also preliminarily affirmed today that the building industry’s latest commercial building energy code will provide an additional 8.5 percent energy savings over the previous standards, as well as an additional 30 percent savings compared to current statewide energy codes, the White House said in a statement. The updated building code will slash carbon emissions by 230 million metric tons by 2030.

The Obama administration also revealed several innovative financing solutions for energy efficiency upgrades and solar projects, since paying for these improvements is the biggest hurdle for residents and businesses to overcome. Fannie Mae, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the Federal Housing Administration announced that they will expand Green Preservation Plus, their mortgage loan that provides additional loan proceeds to owners of affordable housing properties to make energy- and water-saving improvements equal to at least 5 percent of their mortgage loan. The General Services Administration also reported that it is looking to purchase solar arrays in Northern California and the Washington, D.C. area with Federal Aggregated Solar Procurements, modeled after the Defense Department’s successful coordinated purchases of renewables. In addition, the White House said that the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service will soon clarify how investment rules relate to renewable energy installations, which should help promote investment in the clean energy sector.

"Today, America is closer to energy independence than we’ve been in decades," Obama said.

While the country may have a long way to go before reaching energy independence and carbon neutrality, it's encouraging to see so many actors in the public and private sectors taking significant, concrete steps towards cutting carbon emissions.

Image credit: Official White House photo by Pete Souza

Passionate about both writing and sustainability, Alexis Petru is freelance journalist based in the San Francisco Bay Area whose work has appeared on Earth911, Huffington Post and Patch.com. Prior to working as a writer, she coordinated environmental programs for Bay Area cities and counties. Connect with Alexis on Twitter at @alexispetru

Editor’s note: This is the third post in a three-part series on sustainable fish farming startups. In case you missed it, you can read the first post here and the second post here.

In the first two posts of this series, we introduced Kampachi Farms, an open-ocean mariculture startup on the Big Island of Hawaii co-founded by Neil Sims and Michael Bullock. When their mariculture fishery, the Valella project, got started in early 2012, the future of aquaculture and mariculture was uncertain, as a lawsuit brought by Food and Water Watch against the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) pertaining to aquaculture was wending its way through court. The suit brought the founders of Valella into a complicated area that spanned legislation, the role of governments and NGOs, and how to best help environmental groups understand mariculture.

When I recently spoke to Sims for a follow-up interview, he was preparing to travel to the Hague to participate in the Global Ocean Action Summit for Blue Development.

“This is looking at the way that we can grow marine industries in a scalable, responsible manner. Work to feed the planet, work to heal the oceans from the depredation that we’ve put upon her and harness the energy of commercial development to do that.”

From the basic research, Sims and his colleagues began way back with Kona Blue Water Farms, to the Velella test projects (beta and gamma) and on to global operations for ocean mariculture, this is what is near and dear to Sims heart -- finding ways to feed a hungry planet while healing a depleted ocean.

An ocean and a continent away, in New York City, the mission is the same, just replace the blue Pacific with the rooftop of a Manhattan ironworks factory.

Edenworks: Building an inner-city Garden of Eden

Jason Green began his career in neuroscience. But curiosity and a sense of higher purpose got him thinking about urban food systems, the idea of "food deserts” and how these current systems are failing these pockets of malnutrition and hunger, while lacking the resilience to withstand the pressures of climate change and population growth.

That's a lot to think about, so Green didn't give up his day job right away.

“My background is in bioengineering and neuroscience," says Green, founder of Edenworks, an aquaponics startup in New York City. "I was doing my thing in a neuroscience lab at Albert Einstein (College of Medicine).”  About two years ago Green started tinkering with aquaponics on the weekends, designing his own consumer aquaponic farm in his apartment.

“I got aphids and fungus and all sorts of stuff," laughs Green. "I was like 'there’s got to be a better way!’ So I started looking into hydroponics and aeroponics and eventually settled on aquaponics. I realized there was no easy consumer solution for an aquaponics system."

Green launched Edenworks one year ago with a $20,000 grant from New York University's Green Grant Program. Now nearing completion of the 1,000-square-foot flagship farm, Edenworks sits on the top floor of a commercial ironworks in New York City.

New aquaponics: Quantifying the ecosystem

Aquaponics isn’t a new technology. As far back as 1000 B.C. (give or take). Chinese farmers discovered that they could increase the yield of their rice paddies when they let fish swim around and fertilize them with their waste.

“How do we take that very old technology, that was reliant on existing ecology, and create ecosystems to grow food that are separate from the land,” says Green. “There are more than 7 billion of us, 9 billion by 2050. We can’t rely on the land to produce our food. So the choices are, you know. either eugenics, mass starvation or figuring out how to feed ourselves from the cities.”

It is from the land, and the rich soil that supports the nutritious and delicious food we eat, that Green takes an important lesson for Edenworks. "Aquaponics, and especially hydroponics, really haven’t been thinking about how to create the ideal ecology. Delicious food doesn’t come from fertilizer poured on barren topsoil.”

It’s this ecosystem of rich, highly organic soil that Green and his team are working to recreate at Edenworks. “We’re trying to replicate all the richness of soil by figuring out the chemistry that we need to create delicious, living food." A network of sensors continually monitor the environmental chemistry of the farm, Green explains. When harvested, the food is tasted, going through a regime by Edenworks' head-of-product, Sam Yoo, a professional chef.

“We’ve basically taken his palette, what he looks for as a chef … and quantified that.” Using machine algorithms they can then correlate the chemistry to “the things we care about,” Green says, such as nutritional density, flavor and texture.

The task, explains Green is “figuring out how to optimize aquaponics ecosystems that are separate from [land-based] ecology,” but still mimic the best topsoil to produce the tastiest, most nutritious food.

“What we’re building here [at Edenworks] is a lab,” Green says. "We’re going to be selling food from it, but it’s really a lab. It’s a place for us to learn and experiment."

Modular and scalable

"What Edenworks is doing a little bit differently is that we combine aquaponics with vertical design and vertical farming. The goal is to create a model here that we can scale elsewhere.”

Edenworks is also uses a passive solar design. “We use passive solar greenhouses, we don’t use any kind of LEDs, fluorescent or high-pressure sodium or anything like that.” Based on solar radiometry testing, Green says they can stack the vertical greenhouse section six-high, or 10 feet at the top module, with plenty of sun for the entire system.

The vertical design means Edenworks can effectively grow six times the produce for the same square footage of conventional systems, while using 90 percent less water and energy than traditional agri-farming.

Fish and produce

“We design, build and operate the farms and then sell produce and seafood directly to restaurants and business customers. We’d like to get to the scale where we’re selling directly to grocery stores, especially for the seafood because restaurants don’t really want the Tilapia, but even Whole Foods, I just saw Tilapia there for $12 a pound. So certainly it’s something that people eat.”

Tilapia is one of the most common fish species used for both fish and aquaponics farming, and it is the principal fish stock for Edenfarms, along with catfish and prawns.

“The prawn is really interesting,” Green says. “They go for $15 a pound as opposed to anywhere from $8 to $12 a pound for Tilapia and Catfish.”

“Tilapia are perfectly happy with poor water conditions, you can stock them very densely … they’re really ideal for aquaculture.” You're much more likely to find shrimp, tuna or salmon on a restaurant menu than Tilapia. Nonetheless, Tilapia is produced in more than 100 countries and ranks fourth -- behind those species just mentioned -- as the most-consumed seafood globally, according to the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch. But only 5 percent of Tilapia is farmed in the U.S.; the rest is imported.

Creating a new zeitgeist

The long-term vision for Green is to integrate the Edenworks model of food production into building design and development.

“What is unique about Edenworks is the synergistic and whole systems approach,” Green says. “When you put a farm on a rooftop, you basically create this insulating layer.”

The idea is to create not only a solution for local food production but to other building infrastructure challenges as well.

“Maybe even preconditioning your air for the building. You oxygenate it, you filter it, you temper it before you push it into the building.

Ultimately designing buildings that take into consideration the waste management of the building, the energy needs, the food needs, all integrated into these closed-loop ecosystems."

As the idea grows and hopefully scales across rooftops and cities, all these systems and data can be remotely monitored by a web app, creating a distributed network of farms.

“I really see it as a very scalable solution,” Green says. “The goal for us is to be physically and digitally scalable...  you have to create a new zeitgeist. You can’t expect that if something is unfamiliar that it’s going to become the way things are. It has to be obvious in order for it to be the way things are.”

Wait-and-see attitude

Many may still have a cautious, wait-and-see approach to what Edenworks is doing, but when prospective partners grasp the potential of putting “Eden" on their roof, Green says that developers and building managers often tell him, based on the projected increase in building efficiency, that they are more than willing to provide the space rent-free. The increased energy efficiency is the rent.

“By creating this huge insulating layer on the roof, we think that we can increase the HVAC efficiency by about 30 percent. We exist in their space, and they see a return.”

The vertical, passive-solar aquaponics farm built on the Edenworks model provides tasty, nutritious, chemical-free fish and produce to local markets. Scaled through cities across the northeast and eventually the entire country, a distributed network of urban aquaponics farms can supply economical, sustainably-grown food where it is needed most.

Resistance to change

This isn’t to say that Edenworks doesn’t face an uphill climb in public perception, just as with Sims. Green reels off criticisms he hears from naysayers on almost a daily basis. But, like Sims, he takes the criticism head-on and offers solutions to try instead of reasons to maintain an unsustainable status quo. Building scalable, modular, and efficient passive-solar aquaponics farms that integrate into building infrastructure, create "ecologies" that mimic rich soils, and experiment with different fish species to supply nutritious animal protein - all these ideas answer these critics and ask only that these new ideas be given a change to grow.

"There is resistance to every great innovation,” says Green. Echoing Sims' experience, Green says “Even exploring new ideas somehow puts them at risk, that somehow trying something new exposes them to risk of harm or something. I think that people only recently have started thinking about food and energy as problems, that for so long, with the Jevons Paradox has been ignored. We’ve always just tried to do more with less. You make more efficient systems and what ends up happening? Like the Jevons Paradox says, the more efficient you get the more resources you use. And people forgot about that for a really long time.”

“And I think also the emphasis has been for so long on efficiency and not quality. You can think about that in terms of energy, you can think about that in terms of food-like products over food. It’s more attractive to buy something like a Weight Watchers frozen dinner filled with chemicals than just to buy fresh vegetables, and have an equally caloric dinner, but one is healthy and the other is synthetic - and probably carcinogenic.”

Problems like this have plagued humanity for the last hundred years, but figuring “whole systems” approaches to address them are only now are gaining traction. “With the confluence of climate change, peak oil, peak coal, even peak water, people are trying to think about [these issues] in a holistic way.”

Proving the idea

Will it work? Of course it’s too soon to tell. But there doesn’t seem to be any reason for not allowing Green and his colleagues to build out the proof-of-concept lab, experiment and find out what works and what doesn’t.

That goes for Kampachi Farms as well. Sims and his colleagues have helped establish the science, the law and the concept. Overcoming public perception of farmed fish and resistance to eating produce grown in a warehouse can be an uphill battle.

Sims feels that he’s been portrayed as being on the “wrong side of the law" by many environmentalists. But, as he points out, the law is settled. And now so is the science.

What is important to Sims, Green and many other passionate and dedicated people like them, is being on the right side of history. Meeting the challenges dead-on, answering their critics, and working to answer the ultimate question of which we began: how to feed seven, then soon nine, then eleven billion people, without wrecking the planet.

Supporting responsible fish farming and modern aguaponics to help feed the billions of people that increasingly rely on it is the right side of history.

To that point Sims sums it up succinctly:

“… because if you want them to eat beef, the planet is screwed.”

Image credit: Flickr/deanmeyers

Read the rest of Startups in Sustainable Fish Farming: 

• Part 1: Sustainable Fish Startups: From the Open Seas to the Inner City


• Part 2: The Future of Mariculture: Bridging the Gap Between Startups, Lawmakers and NGOs


• Part 3: Sustainable Fish Farming: Global-Scale Aquaculture in the Big City

Providing the U.S. government and public with its most thorough and comprehensive “status report on climate change science and impacts” to date, the National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee (NCADAC) on May 6 released the final version of the Third National Climate Assessment report (NCA-3).

“From the top of the atmosphere to the depths of the oceans ... and in the observed and measured changes in location and behavior of species and the functioning of ecosystems,” evidence that our climate is warming -- and the resulting impacts across U.S. society and geography -- abound today, according to NCA-3. “Taken together, this evidence tells an unambiguous story: The planet is warming, and over the last half century, this warming has been driven primarily by human activity." The main culprit, report authors add, is our burning of fossil fuels.

Moreover, meticulous observations of some key climate indicators, such as sea-level rise and arctic sea ice melt, are changing faster than the best climate models envisioned. Realization of the worst future climate scenarios can still avoided, but much greater reductions in carbon and greenhouse gas emissions will have to be achieved at a much faster rate than is taking place at present, NCA-3 authors conclude.

U.S. and global climate trends

The average temperature in the U.S. has increased 1.3 to 1.9 degrees Fahrenheit since record-keeping began in 1895, NCA-3 highlights, with most of the increase occurring since about 1970. The warming trend is expected to continue, with the decade just past being the nation's warmest on record to date. And as NCA-3 report authors note: “Because human-induced warming is superimposed on a naturally varying climate, the temperature rise has not been, and will not be, uniform or smooth across the country or over time.”

In the “Highlights of Climate Trends” section of the report, the report authors state:

“Global climate is changing and this change is apparent across a wide range of observations. The global warming of the past 50 years is primarily due to human activities. Global climate is projected to continue to change over this century and beyond. The magnitude of climate change beyond the next few decades depends primarily on the amount of heat-trapping gases emitted globally, and how sensitive the Earth's climate is to those emissions.”

A comprehensive, integrated assessment of climate change

In addition to the integrated analysis of climate change and impacts it provides, by comparing actual observations made across the U.S. with predictions from climate system models, the NCA-3 also serves as a “gauge” of greater scientific knowledge and improved understanding of the nature, mechanisms and potential impacts of our warming climate.

Looking to broaden, as well as deepen, our understanding of climate change and its socioeconomic and ecological impacts, NCA-3 incorporates advances in climate science “into larger social, ecological, and policy systems, and with this provide integrated analyses of impacts and vulnerability.” It also drills down to offer analyses of climate change and impacts across 10 U.S. regions, from Alaska and Hawaii to Maine and Florida, as well as in rural areas and along U.S. coasts.

The result of a four-year long production process that included public comment and inter-agency government review, the NCA, though based on scientific research, is intended to inform and guide public policy across every sphere of U.S. society.

Analyzing future climate scenarios and impacts

Based on actual observations and the best climate models scientists have to offer, the third NCA extends well beyond scientific research. Incorporating actual climate observations and calibrating them with the best climate models available, NCA authors created a wide range of climate scenarios. They then assessed the potential ecological and socioeconomic impacts of these scenarios across the geography of the U.S.

In the report's introduction, NCA authors provide a broad summary of the results and conclusions that are explained in greater detail in the 12 sections of the report. Encouragingly, they state that scientists' understanding of Earth's complex climate -- and humanity's role in shaping and influencing it -- has improved greatly in recent decades. On the other hand, observations of some key climate change indicators are changing at faster rates than those envisioned by climate models.

The NCA report authors write, “With each passing year, the accumulating evidence further expands our understanding and extends the record of observed trends in temperature, precipitation, sea level, ice mass, and many other variables recorded by a variety of measuring systems and analyzed by independent research groups from around the world.

"It is notable that as these data records have grown longer and climate models have become more comprehensive, earlier predictions have largely been confirmed. The only real surprises have been that some changes, such as sea level rise and Arctic sea ice decline, have outpaced earlier projections.

“What is new over the last decade is that we know with increasing certainty that climate change is happening now. While scientists continue to refine projections of the future, observations unequivocally show that climate is changing and that the warming of the past 50 years is primarily due to human-induced emissions of heat-trapping gases. These emissions come mainly from burning coal, oil, and gas, with additional contributions from forest clearing and some agricultural practices."

Producing the Third National Climate Assessment

A 60-person Federal Advisory Committee, the NCADAC, was created by the Department of Commerce in 2010 “to oversee the activities of the National Climate Assessment.” Supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), NCAs are produced every four years as per the Global Change Research Act of 1990 -- a $2.6 billion federal research program on global change.

In producing the Third National Climate Assessment, the NCADAC enlisted more than 300 expert contributors. Following the January 2013 release of a draft version of the report, more than 4,000 public comments were received and reviewed by the authors and National Academies.

The resulting Government Review Draft, along with “derivative highlights,” was then submitted for formal inter-agency review. The NCADAC adopted the final version of the report and Highlights and submitted them to the federal government for publication and distribution on May 6.

In order to provide a thorough, comprehensive and integrated assessment of climate change and its impacts, NCA authors created scenarios based on a wide range of assumptions about population growth, economic development, technological evolution, and environmental policy and regulatory decisions, among other factors.

Quantitative and narrative descriptions of “plausible future conditions,” these scenarios served as inputs to the analysis of potential impacts and responses to climate change. Encompassing climate and sea level changes, land use and socioeconomic conditions, the scenarios weren't associated with probabilities, and hence they aren't predictions or forecasts. Rather, the NCADAC elaborates, they “provide a range of future conditions to bound uncertainty.”

NCA-3's 12 key messages

NCA-3 report authors highlight 12 “Key Messages” that correspond to the report's 12 chapters and spotlight key climate trends and their potential impacts across U.S. society and geography.

1. Observed Climate Change: Global climate is changing and this change is apparent across a wide range of observations. The global warming of the past 50 years is primarily due to human activities.


2. Future Climate Change: Global climate is projected to continue to change over this century and beyond. The magnitude of climate change beyond the next few decades depends primarily on the amount of heat-trapping gases emitted globally, and how sensitive the Earth’s climate is to those emissions.


3. Recent U.S. Temperature Trends: U.S. average temperature has increased by 1.3 to 1.9 degrees Fahrenheit since record keeping began in 1895; most of this increase has occurred since about 1970. The most recent decade was the nation’s warmest on record. Temperatures in the United States are expected to continue to rise. Because human-induced warming is superimposed on a naturally varying climate, the temperature rise has not been, and will not be, uniform or smooth across the country or over time.


4. Lengthening Frost-free Season: The length of the frost-free season (and the corresponding growing season) has been increasing nationally since the 1980s, with the largest increases occurring in the western United States, affecting ecosystems and agriculture. Across the United States, the growing season is projected to continue to lengthen.


5. U.S. Precipitation Change: Average U.S. precipitation has increased since 1900, but some areas have had increases greater than the national average, and some areas have had decreases. More winter and spring precipitation is projected for the northern United States, and less for the Southwest, over this century.


6. Heavy Downpours Increasing: Heavy downpours are increasing nationally, especially over the last three to five decades. Largest increases are in the Midwest and Northeast. Increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme precipitation events are projected for all U.S. regions.


7. Extreme Weather: There have been changes in some types of extreme weather events over the last several decades. Heat waves have become more frequent and intense, especially in the West. Cold waves have become less frequent and intense across the nation. There have been regional trends in floods and droughts. Droughts in the Southwest and heat waves everywhere are projected to become more intense, and cold waves less intense everywhere.


8. Changes in Hurricanes: The intensity, frequency, and duration of North Atlantic hurricanes, as well as the frequency of the strongest (Category 4 and 5) hurricanes, have all increased since the early 1980s. The relative contributions of human and natural causes to these increases are still uncertain. Hurricane-associated storm intensity and rainfall rates are projected to increase as the climate continues to warm.


9. Changes in Storms: Winter storms have increased in frequency and intensity since the 1950s, and their tracks have shifted northward over the United States. Other trends in severe storms, including the intensity and frequency of tornadoes, hail, and damaging thunderstorm winds, are uncertain and are being studied intensively.


10. Sea Level Rise: Global sea level has risen by about 8 inches since reliable record keeping began in 1880. It is projected to rise another 1 to 4 feet by 2100.


11. Melting Ice: Rising temperatures are reducing ice volume and surface extent on land, lakes, and sea. This loss of ice is expected to continue. The Arctic Ocean is expected to become essentially ice free in summer before mid-century.


12. Ocean Acidification: The oceans are currently absorbing about a quarter of the carbon dioxide emitted to the atmosphere annually and are becoming more acidic as a result, leading to concerns about intensifying impacts on marine ecosystems.

Images courtesy of the NCADAC Third National Climate Assessment

By Michelle Morgan-Nelsen

Africa is an economy in waiting, which some say has the potential to leapfrog developed economies. Nigerian economist and philanthropist Tony O. Elumelu believes that the private sector's role in solving social issues will be key to Africa's economic success. In this vein, we asked Elumelu – chairman of Heirs Holdings, an African investment company – about shared value, the management strategy where companies create profits by addressing social problems that intersect with their business, and how it might help kick-start Africa’s growth.

And to learn more about how business’s potential to catalyze both social and economic growth in a fledgling economy, Elumelu will also be speaking live on a panel of shared value experts and investors on May 13.

Shared Value Initiative: What does the success of shared value look like at Heirs Holdings? Tell us your favorite shared value story or example.

Tony O. Elumelu: The shared value concept to us at Heirs Holdings is synonymous with Africapitalism, which we practice and strongly advocate. Africapitalism is a call on the private sector to invest in Africa for the long term in key sectors of the economy that have the potential to create financial prosperity as well as social wealth. This is the philosophy under which we operate, and influences both the sectors we focus on, and the investments we make.

In 2011, we invested in agriculture in Benue State [Nigeria], which is considered the food basket of the nation. This is a part of the country that yields a significant amount of Nigeria’s produce, including citrus fruits. Yet, despite the high demand for fruit juice, Benue had never successfully established the capacity to convert the raw produce to a consumer product that had a ready market. In the meantime, Nigeria continued importing tons of fruit juice concentrate to serve the growing middle class population.

We invested in a local juice concentrate plant supplying makers of fruit juice, which is the first of its kind in Nigeria, and this is already having a positive and measurable impact on the community.

We purchase oranges, pineapples and mangoes that previously couldn’t be sold and would be left to rot on the ground—as much as 60 percent of the production was lost every year. We’re empowering the community, from farmers to the many that are directly and indirectly employed by our activities, and we’ve introduced technology to the country that hitherto never existed—that to us is truly shared value.

SVI: Why is shared value one of your priorities as the leader of your company?

TOE: Shared value is a priority to me as the Chairman of Heirs Holdings because I believe that economic prosperity and social wealth must go hand in hand for maximum impact. Success cannot be measured purely in economic terms, and our investment activities aren’t strictly driven by profitability—though our ultimate responsibility to our shareholders remains creating economic value for them. We believe that a shared value approach accomplishes this mandate as it sets the stage for continued wealth creation over the long term.

Heirs Holdings is an African proprietary investment company that not only practices Africapitalism, but also commits to active management of our portfolio companies, to ensure the growth and preservation of our investments. This underscores the importance of sustainability, which we believe is paramount for lasting development and growth on the continent.

SVI: What are the most innovative opportunities that you see for shared value in your investments?

TEO: The shared value concept is easier to implement in companies dealing in consumer goods or operating in socially-oriented sectors, like agriculture. It becomes more difficult to integrate shared value in a resource extraction business or a utility. However, we have done just that through some of our most recent transactions.

One of our most well-known investments is the Transcorp Ughelli power plant, based in the Niger Delta, which will more than double its generating capacity within three to five years. The plant is the largest gas-fired power generating facility in Nigeria, and we have a direct supply of natural gas to power it. This also gives us the unique ability to convert excess natural gas for industrial use—a novelty in a country that has been flaring gas for decades.

Our investment will create unprecedented access to electricity in the community, improve healthcare and education outcomes, and give Nigeria the ability to power industries, which has an uncommon multiplier effect in a fast-developing nation like ours. Furthermore, through the transfer of skills and knowledge, we will educate our own people to deliver for the long term.

Watch Tony Elumelu speak more to business’s role in kick-starting Africa’s economy on a panel of investors the Shared Value Leadership Summit this May 13 from 8:30am-10:30am EST at http://sharedvalue.org/livestream. Follow the conversation on Twitter @SVInitiative and #SVInvest. 

Michelle Morgan-Nelsen is senior manager of communications at the Shared Value Initiative. 

As part of our series on sustainable seafood, we’re doing profiles on a couple of startups in the community supported fisheries (CSF) business. Last week I spoke with Sean Barrett, founder of Dock to Dish, a CSF serving the New York metropolitan area from Montauk, Long Island. This week I spoke with Sean Dixon of Village Fishmonger, another CSF in the New York area.

Unlike, Dock to Dish, which was founded by and overseen by fishermen, Village Fishmonger is coming at this from another angle. Among its three founders, Sean Dixon, Samantha Lee and Dennis O’Connor, two have their roots in the restaurant business. Sean, who I spoke with, is a marine biologist and environmental advocate. Sean has an almost evangelical drive to teach people about the ocean and the many creatures living in it. And while the CSF -- which currently has between 500 and 600 members -- constitutes the core of their business, they all spend a great deal of time reaching out to the public, telling them the story of seafood, educating them about the great potential to improve our food system by, among other things, taking advantage of the enormous resources just to the east of them.

They see it as their mission to reconnect the city with its long heritage as a seafood producing and consuming town. “Most people don’t realize,” said Dixon, “that NYC was once the oyster capital of the world.” The last of the New York City oyster beds were closed in 1927, primarily due to toxicity, but there is hope for recovery. In fact, that is the mission of NY/NJ Baykeeper. Founded with the help of the Hudson Riverkeeper and the American Littoral Society in 1989, their mission is to preserve, protect and restore the most urban estuary on the planet.

Support for these kinds of activities is what has led them to collaborate with Future of Fish, Riverpark restaurant and others to produce the second annual Sustainable Seafood Week NYC, which is going on now. The event is a “culinary-fueled celebration … showcasing the efforts of local fishermen, chefs, organizations and communities to promote responsible sourcing of seafood.” In addition to ticketed fundraising events, there will be “programming geared towards anyone that's a stakeholder in the sustainable seafood discussion, including restaurant professionals, seafood purveyors, and scientists.”

The kickoff Sustainable Seafood Shindig event, took place on Tuesday May 6 at Riverpark, with close to 200 people attending. Net proceeds from the event will be donated to NY/NJ Baykeeper. I asked Dixon about Village Fishmonger and what we can expect to see at this year's Sustainable Seafood Week.

TriplePundit: Can you tell us a little about about the role Village Fishmonger plays in helping people make a sustainable choice in their seafood purchases?

Sean Dixon: People can click over to the fish tab on our website and see what we source and why we source it. They can click through to Fishwatch.gov and the fisheries councils and see why that is a responsible choice. This is [a] dynamic area, so you have to update your information regularly. Just recently, for example, butterfish, which had been considered overfished, has now been restored to the point where it is now suitable for commercial fishing.

3p: What is your service area?

SD: We fish anywhere from Cape May, N.J. to Montauk, N.Y. and serve the community all along the coastline. The geographic range helps out sometimes when the weather is bad in one portion of our range.

3p: How many fishermen do you work with, and what methods do they use?

SD: We work with six different fishing cooperatives that supply us with fish from close to a hundred boats. Mainly they are long-liners and trawlers.

3p: So what question keeps you up at night?

SD: There are millions of people in America who eat seafood, and there are lots of sustainable fisheries now in operation -- where the gear is managed, where the bycatch is utilized -- and it is being done in a way that is infinitely better than most of the imported seafood [yet 90 percent of the seafood consumed in the U.S. is imported]. So the question is, how do we scale this up? How do we match up the demand with the supply?

3p: Not everyone lives near the ocean.

SD: That’s true. But we’ve been talking with a group in Boulder, Colo. They’re looking at sourcing and carbon impact. They have some great connections in Florida and Seattle, and they’re going to be able to make this work. This is being done all over the country, but it’s just like all the other aspects of our food system. People need to move away from the 99-cent, industrially-produced fish patty and move closer to a storied food -- that is locally produced, in most cases is better for you and can often be just as cheap or cheaper, and in all cases, it benefits the local economy.

3p: So how do we get there?

SD: Well, it’s easier for people who have lived near the water. For the many others, who have become so disconnected from the source of their food, it’s these new markets where you need to put the time in to explain to people what this is and really build that connection back to the sea.

3p: So that brings us around to Sustainable Seafood Week NYC. Can you connect the dots for me on what happens there and how this helps people make the trip?

SD:  We wanted to have a day where we could bring everybody together into one spot. Where we could have a day where we could talk to people in the fishing industry and the food purchasing industry and talk about these questions of story. Where we could have events at everybody’s favorite restaurant where the chefs come out and inform you about the local catch of the day and where it’s coming from and why they chose it. Where people could come to events and learn how to fillet a fish and for some, to learn what a fish looks like before it becomes a fillet. They could see what they are eating. They could talk to the people who caught that fish and ask them where they caught it and how and why. So we thought if we could do this all together in one big seafood celebration week, it will be able to reach a lot more people, and so far it has.

3p: That’s great. The festival is still going on. It wraps up this weekend with a number more events. For those in the area who are interested, check out the schedule here.

Image credit: Pexels

This week at the Abu Dhabi Ascent climate meeting in the United Arab Emirates, renewable energy company Masdar, in partnership with the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC), announced that it will sponsor the region's first solar electric car competition to take place in the UAE next January. The event will coincide with Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week, while the completion will be at the opening ceremony of The World Future Energy Summit.

The challenge, which is sanctioned by the International Solarcar Federation (ISF), invites student teams from 20 countries around the world to participate in the four-day event -- which will take place over a 1,200 kilometer (750 mile) course, comprised of both urban and desert environments. The winner of the endurance event will be the team that completes the course in the shortest overall time.

Though ADNOC's reason for being is to integrate the country's oil and gas industry interests, the Petroleum Institute, one of ADNOC's academic institutions, will be entering a solar vehicle in the contest. During the press conference, Mr. Mohammed S. Al Qubaisi of ADNOC said that the company believes in the importance of scientific research and that the event would help cement their position in renewables. A primary objective of the solar challenge is to bring a knowledge base to UAE universities, and to that end, universities will pair up with the international teams for the contest.

The event follows in the footsteps of similar solar car challenges held around the world such as the World Solar Challenge held in Australia, and the American Solar challenge hosted in the U.S. In turn, these events were inspired by Mr. Hans Tholstrup's crossing of Australia back in 1982, when it took him 20 days to achieve the crossing at a speed of just 23 kilometers per hour. Tholstrup, now president of the ISF, was on hand at the press conference announcing next years event: "We had been exploring the addition of a solar challenge in the Middle East and North Africa region for several years now. The emergence of the UAE as a leader in the region in future energy and education is quite evident and it became the natural choice for this challenge."

Tholstrup went on to say that since his Australia crossing over 30 years ago, the technology incorporated into student vehicles has improved beyond expectation. Modern iterations of solar electric vehicles are over four times faster today, now reaching speeds of up to 100 kmh (62.5 mph), and make use of lightweight carbon fiber materials, the best solar panels and electric motors available, and low resistance tires. When you consider the cars are drawing about the same power as an electric hair dryer, the performance is pretty astounding. Tholstrup emphasized events like the Abu Dhabi solar challenge focus on three important objectives: Education, energy efficiency and environmental consciousness.

Students are able to develop and showcase their technical and creative abilities, while also gaining an understanding of marketing, business and management skills needed to execute large and complex projects, according to the press release.

Still, some people may be wondering what practical purpose the cars themselves provide. After all, as you can see from the picture, the fragile-looking, single-seat pod hardly offers much day-to-day utility and wouldn't be of any use hauling the family around.

Instead, these vehicles push the boundaries of technical possibilities, which allows many of the technologies developed to be transferred into commercial applications. For example, Tholstrup pointed out that through the pursuit of solar challenges, teams have to focus on achieving maximal efficiency to make the most of the sun's energy. This has translated into the development of electric motors that are as much as 96 percent efficient, and that learning goes into the development of future products - a useful efficiency boost, even if we shouldn't expect to see solar powered family cars in the future. When you consider an internal combustion engine is only in the region of 30 to 40 percent efficient, it provides electric vehicles with a very significant advantage.

Image courtesy of Masdar

Travel expenses for the Author and TriplePundit to attend Abu Dhabi Ascent were provided by Masdar.

Follow me on Twitter: @PhilCovBlog

Editor's note: This is the second post in a two-part series on renewables in India. In case you missed, you can read the first post here.

By Darshan Goswami, M.S., P.E.

In the coming years, India will face seemingly insurmountable challenges to its economy, environment and energy security. To overcome these challenges, India needs to shift to non-polluting sources of energy. To reach the goal of 100 percent renewable energy by 2050 the following steps are recommended.

1. Expand large-scale deployment

Aggressively expand large-scale deployment of both centralized and distributed renewable energy, including solar, wind, hydro, biomass and geothermal, to ease the strain on the present transmission and distribution system, and allow more off-grid populations to be reached. Facilitate growth in large-scale deployment by installing 100 million solar roofs and large utility-scale solar generation, through both centralized and distributed energy within the next 20 years.

2. Set a standard

Enact a National Renewable Energy Standard/Policy that calls for 20 percent renewable energy by 2020 – to create demand, new industries and innovation, and a new wave of green jobs.

3. Put the policies in place

Develop favorable government policies to ease the permitting process, and to provide start-up capital to promote the exponential growth of renewable energy. Create and fund a national smart infrastructure bank for renewable energy.

4. Increase demand

Accelerate local demand for renewable energy by providing preferential Feed-in-Tariffs (FIT) and other incentives such as accelerated depreciation; tax holidays; renewable energy funds; initiatives for international partnerships/collaboration, incentives for new technologies; human resources development; zero import duty on capital equipment and raw materials; excise duty exemption; and low interest rate loans.

5. Phase out conventional subsidies

Phase out all conventional energy subsidies. Force petroleum products to compete with other fuels like biomass and biogas, etc.

6. Increase energy efficiency

Accelerate the development and implementation of cost-effective energy efficiency standards to reduce the long-term demand for energy. Engage States, industrial companies, utility companies and other stakeholders to accelerate this investment.

7. Electrify automobiles

Initiate a move to electrify automotive transportation or develop electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids – such as the Nissan Leaf, Tesla Model S, or Chevy Volt, etc. Develop and implement time-of-day pricing to encourage charging of cars at night. Adopt nationwide charging of electric cars from solar panels on roofs, and solar-powered electric vehicle charging stations around the country. Thousands of these solar-powered recharging stations could spread across India just like the present public call office (PCO), giving birth to the “Green Revolution.” These recharging connections could be deployed at highly-concentrated areas including shopping malls, motels, restaurants and public places where vehicles are usually parked for extended periods.

8. Invest in two-way and micro-grids

Aggressively invest in a smart, two-way grid (and micro-grid). Invest in smart meters, as well as reliable networks that can accommodate the two-way flow of electricity. Such networks need to be resilient enough to avoid blackouts and accommodate the advanced power generation technologies of the future.

9. Develop solar manufacturing

Develop large scale solar manufacturing in India (transforming India into a global solar manufacturing hub). Promote and establish utility-scale solar and wind generation parks and farms. Also, establish R&D facilities within academia, research institutions, industry, government and private entities to guide technology development.

10. Work towards a hydrogen economy

Work towards a hydrogen economy development plan. Hydrogen can be fed into fuel cells for generating heat and electricity – as well as for powering fuel cell vehicles. Produce hydrogen from renewable energy sources such as solar and wind. If done successfully, hydrogen and electricity will eventually become society's primary energy carriers for the 21st century.

Conclusion

Renewable forms of energy (especially solar and wind) could enhance India’s energy security and represent a bright spot in its economic and environmental future. If India switched from coal, oil, natural gas and nuclear power plants, it is possible that 70 percent of the electricity and 35 percent of its total energy could be derived from renewable resources by 2030.

Excess energy generated from renewables could be stored in various forms such as molten or liquid salt (a mixture of sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate); compressed air; pumped hydro; hydrogen, battery storage, etc. This stored energy could then be used during times of peak demand.

India can ramp up its efforts to develop and implement large utility-scale solar energy farms to meet the country's economic development goals, while creating energy independence and bringing potentially enormous environmental benefits. Both issues have a direct influence on national security and the health of the Indian economy.

Supplying almost 100 percent of India’s energy demand through the use of clean renewable energy from solar, wind, hydro and biogas, etc. by 2050 is technically and economically feasible. But, a number of political barriers must be overcome. As examples of needed reforms, Denmark's Parliament has passed the most ambitious green economy plan to generate 35 percent of its energy from renewable energy by 2020 and 100 percent by 2050. Iceland, Scotland and the Philippines, have recently announced impressive plans to obtain 100 percent of their power from renewable energy. Three years after Japan's nuclear meltdown, the Japanese province of Fukushima has pledged to switch to 100 percent renewable energy by 2040.

A future powered by renewable energy is already here, not decades away. Comparisons of costs per kilowatt hour of electricity produced show that newly built solar and wind plants are already considerably cheaper than new nuclear plants. In coming years solar and wind energy will compete more and more favorably with conventional energy generation and, in places such as California and Italy, have already reached so-called “grid parity.”

Renewable energy (especially solar and wind) is a game-changer for India: It has the potential to re-energize India's economy by creating millions of new jobs, achieve energy independence, reduce the trade deficit and propel India forward as a “Green Nation.” Providing 100 percent renewable energy is not a fantasy for someday, but a reality today. India has a golden opportunity to solve three huge problems — reducing poverty, ensuring energy security and combating climate change. But it must act soon! India can no longer afford to delay renewable energy deployment to meet its future energy needs.

Image credit: Flickr/vax-o-matic

The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the writer and are not intended to represent the views or policies of the United States Department of Energy or the United States. The article was not prepared as part of the writer's official duties at the United States Department of Energy.

Darshan Goswami has over 40 years of experience in the energy field. He is currently working as a Project Manager for Renewable Energy and Smart Grid projects at the United States Department of Energy (DOE) in Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Previously, he was a Chief of Energy Forecasting and Renewable Energy at the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in Washington, DC and spent three decades at Duquesne Light Company, an electric utility company in Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Darshan is a registered Professional Electrical Engineer with a passion and commitment to promote, develop and deploy Renewable Energy Resources and the Hydrogen Economy.

Environmentalists and beer lovers alike can raise their glasses in a toast: Aluminum manufacturer and recycler Novelis has unveiled an aluminum beverage can sheet that has been independently certified to contain a minimum of 90 percent recycled material. Red Hare Brewing Co. will be the first company to package its product in Novelis’ “evercan,” with the new high-recycled-content can expected to hit shelves in the southeastern U.S. later this month.

“This introduction marks the commercial availability of the world’s first certified high-recycled-content aluminum beverage can,” said Phil Martens, Novelis’ president and CEO, in a statement.

Red Hare chose the “evercan” product as part of its commitment to reduce the microbrewery’s environmental footprint, the company said on its blog.

“We were the first microbrewery in Georgia to package our craft beer in cans two years ago because aluminum cans have a much lower carbon footprint than glass bottles,” said Red Hare founder and CEO Roger Davis. “With the new ‘evercan,’ we are getting closer to full-loop recycling, which is the right thing to do for our planet. We are further reducing our environmental footprint while providing our loyal Red Hare fans with the portability, freshness and taste they love.”

The “evercan” is responsible for 72 percent fewer carbon emissions over its lifetime than glass bottles are and 22 percent few emissions compared to typical aluminum cans, according to Red Hare. Furthermore, the brewery said, recycling aluminum requires 95 percent less energy and produces 95 percent fewer greenhouse gas emissions than mining and using virgin aluminum.

Three of Red Hare’s store brands – Long Day Lager, Gangway IPA and Watership Brown – will all be converted to “evercan” packaging through May and will be sold in Georgia, South Carolina and Tennessee.

Novelis’ high-recycled-content can is currently available to beverage companies worldwide, the company said in a statement. Its facilities in North America, Europe, South America and Asia have been certified to produce the “evercan” by third-party environmental auditor SCS Global Services. The development of the “evercan” is part of Novelis’ goal to dramatically increase the recycled content of its products across its global operations to 80 percent by 2020.

Aluminum cans are one of recycling’s greatest – and quietest – success stories. They can be recycled back into the same product an infinite number of times: In fact, nearly 75 percent of all aluminum ever produced is still in use today, according to the Can Manufacturers Institute. Aluminum cans also boast one of the highest recycled content percentages among beverage containers – 68 percent – the trade group reports.

Yet you rarely hear news stories about this financially-sound and environmentally-responsible industry practice. Instead, media coverage tends to focus on the plastic bottle: Consumers assume plastic bottles are recycled back to plastic beverage containers, but the industry has been struggling to make this closed-loop recycling system a reality.

The recycled content of typical aluminum cans may be so robust that we can take this environmental triumph for granted, but now Novelis and Red Hare Brewing are raising the bar in their industry.

"Novelis' ‘evercan’ is an excellent model for sustainability-based innovation, which will enable  beverage brands and retailers to advance their own sustainable packaging goals," said Stuart L. Hart, S. J. Johnson Professor Emeritus in Sustainable Global Enterprise at Cornell University, founder of the Enterprise for a Sustainable World and author of “Capitalism at the Crossroads.” "This introduction also serves as an important catalyst to educate other brand holders and consumers about the value of closed-loop aluminum recycling and engage them to take action themselves."

Image credit: PRNewsFoto/Novelis Inc.

Passionate about both writing and sustainability, Alexis Petru is freelance journalist based in the San Francisco Bay Area whose work has appeared on Earth911, Huffington Post and Patch.com. Prior to working as a writer, she coordinated environmental programs for Bay Area cities and counties. Connect with Alexis on Twitter at @alexispetru

Editor’s note: This is the second post in a three-part series on sustainable fish farming startups. You can read the first post here and the third here. 

In the first post of this series, we introduced Kampachi Farms, an open-ocean mariculture startup on the Big Island of Hawaii co-founded by Neil Sims and Michael Bullock. When their mariculture fishery, the Valella project, got started in early 2012, the future of aquaculture and mariculture was uncertain, as a lawsuit brought by Food and Water Watch against the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) was wending its way through court. Principal among the issues Food and Water Watch had with NOAA was allowing the Velella project to proceed in federal waters.

Food and Water Watch characterized Velella as “factory fish farming,” challenging its legality in court with the Magnuson-Stevens Act as the basis for its argument.

The Magnuson-Stevens Act of 1976 is the primary law governing management of marine fisheries in the United States. Formally known as the Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976, the law has undergone a number of amendments since then, including the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 and the Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006.

“They [Food and Water Watch] thought that aquaculture was not fishing,” says Sims. “NOAA’s position is that, under the Magnuson-Stevens Act, which refers to the harvesting of living marine resources, there can be aquaculture as well.” Food and Water Watch lost their initial suit as well as an appeal in the 9th Circuit.

“It’s pretty much settled law now,” Sims says. “The Magnuson-Stevens Act for years, probably 15 years, has been swirling around. A lot of effort and emotion has been expended on trying to set in place national aquaculture legislation.” The result of all the effort and emotion as that, under Magnuson-Stevens, aquaculture in federal waters should continue, regulated by the Regional Fisheries Management Councils, that already manage federally regulated fish species.

The Gulf of Mexico has led the effort over the past decade, drafting a regional fisheries management plan for Aquaculture which authorizes NOAA to issue permits and oversee the industry in the Gulf. Despite frustration on the pace of actually writing and implementing rules around the plan, Sims credits NOAA and the Department of Commerce with finally coming up with a national plan for aquaculture.

“NOAA has collated a lot of information on fish farming impacts,” Sims says. “There’s a beautiful bit of work done by two NOAA folk… from the National Oceans Service. They come at it more from a disinterested environmental perspective." The research, entitled Marine Cage Culture and the Environment: Twenty-First Century Science Informing a Sustainable Industry, looks at all global environmental impacts from net pen aquaculture.

Summarizing their findings, Sims says: “As long as you’re in deep enough water -- water that’s twice as deep as your net pen is [and] as long as there’s a reasonable current -- your pens have no impact, no significant impact on water quality. And 30 meters away from the pen no significant impact on the substrate. It’s pretty hard to argue with that."

With impartial research done and federal policy, currently undergoing review by the Office of Management and Budget, finally falling into place, Sims hopes to see comprehensive rules in place for issuing permits for aquaculture by the end of the year.

“It’s been very, very frustrating how slowly NOAA has moved,” Sims says, “but they’re moving.”

What’s also been frustrating, not only for Sims but for anyone interested in developing sustainable net pen aquaculture, has been pushback, misunderstanding and sometimes misinformation coming from environmentalists and NGOs.

Fighting anti-corporate sentiment: When the NGOs just don’t get it

“Two years ago there was a lot of frustration from industry aspirants that the NGOs just didn’t get it,” says Sims. But, just like the progress made in management policy and regulation, things are finally changing for the better. "In the last two years there has been a significant swing in the conventional wisdom amongst the more progressive-thinking NGOs,” Sims says. Among those progressive NGOs Sims points especially to WWF.

"WWF essentially said: 'Let’s stop beating up on aquaculture, because we need aquaculture - desperately. Let’s start supporting good aquaculture and give it this seal of approval.'”

To that end, WWF has launched the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), providing globally available ASC-certified farmed products. “Credit to WWF for taking that visionary stand,” Sims says. He also applauds Conservation International’s study Blue Frontiers finding that aquaculture is, by far, the least impactful means of animal protein production.

“And this is coming from Conservation International,” says Sims, “the paragons for purity in terms of the environmental movement.”

The ongoing anti-aquaculture sentiment that continues is, in Sims’ view, a combination of emotion -- reacting to something new and not fully understand, with elements of an “anti-corporate” attitude. “They just don’t like businesses involved in the food production system,” Sims says.

“Now that’s a far bigger issue than aquaculture. It’s just that because aquaculture is new it’s easy for them to beat up on a smaller, new industry than to take on bigger … what, are they going to take on beef?”

But as we’ve seen, much of the problems of early aquaculture come from individuals starting under-capitalized, poorly-conceived operations.

“When large corporations get involved and they get a proper engineering department, they get properly capitalized, buy the right sort of cages. they can get selectively-bred salmon that perform better. more efficient converting the feed, and they operate these facilities very, very well.”

For Sims, the “emotional swirl” against business and specifically the business of aquaculture is a very sore point. Business, good business, is how things get accomplished.

“It wasn’t corporate agriculture that created the dust bowl,” Sims says, “it was small landholders overgrazing."

Velella Gamma and beyond

The next, or “gamma,” phase of the Velella project, as Sims describes it, involves testing “over the horizon” aquaculture. “The drifter cage idea was a lot of fun,” he says, “some spectacular biological performance of the fish; difficult to see how we could commercialize it.”

For the Gamma test, Sims and his team take the same cage, same species, same stocking density and diet in the same body of water, but instead of a drifting net an anchor is put down. One mooring line is used to hold the pen at a 6,000-foot depth six miles offshore with 12,000 feet of line anchored to 20,000 pounds of concrete at the bottom.

“The initial indication are very encouraging. We are also looking at taking this Velella technology globally. We have keen interest from Asia, the Middle East and the Mediterranean. We are in the planning stages of the world’s first high seas aquaculture project. Aquaculture in international waters in the Mediterranean.”

A project is also in the works in Mexico. “We’re moving forward in a Mexican operation, we have some initial investment there and we are planning to out fish in the water by July of this year (2014) and have fish in the market by May of 2015.”

Image credit: Kampachi Farms

Read the rest of Startups in Sustainable Fish Farming: 

• Part 1: Sustainable Fish Startups: From the Open Seas to the Inner City


• Part 2: The Future of Mariculture: Bridging the Gap Between Startups, Lawmakers and NGOs


• Part 3: Sustainable Fish Farming: Global-Scale Aquaculture in the Big City

 

Image: Models walk the runway wearing upscaled garments at a Redress fashion show. 

By Beth Stewart of Redress

In a world still churning out trendy throw-away fashion pieces at breakneck speed, the idea of upcycled or refashioned apparel can be an anomaly. But it is a continuously growing trend and is one of the most sustainable things people can do in fashion. As upcycling makes use of already existing pieces, it often uses few resources in its creation and actually keeps ‘unwanted’ items out of the waste stream.

Yes, your clothes have an afterlife

There are more textiles produced in the world today than can be used -- many of the large clothing chains can produce as many as a half a billion garments a year. And what happens to those clothes after they have fulfilled their ‘useful’ lives? About 14.3 million tons of textiles were sent to the landfill in 2012, or around 5.7 percent of total municipal solid waste generation in the U.S., according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

If not discarded as trash, unwanted apparel is often donated to thrift stores. Though a good step toward avoiding the landfill, this is not as beneficial as people think - only about 20 to 30 percent of donated clothing is actually re-sold. And the drastic increase in the volume of secondhand clothing has driven down its value in the past 15 years -- meaning that charity shop stores are now filled with cheap fashion and junky basics instead of vintage gems.

In addition, massive amounts of donated clothing that are not deemed as ‘re-sellable’ in the U.S. are shipped to developing countries, inundating them with unnecessary goods that stifle any emerging economic development in textiles. While many people may have the idea that they are helping clothe the poor in these countries, access to the Internet and cell phones has made many of these countries more fashion-forward recently, and they may have no interest in our American cast-offs. Since this model relies on a waste economy -- where instead of mending clothes or leasing clothes, items are bought and discarded -- what happens when exportation is no longer an option?

What is upcycling?

Upcycling is a way of processing an item to make it better than the original. In the example of clothing, this is often taking something that doesn’t fit or is stained/torn and refashioning a wearable product from it.

Upcycling can be done using either pre-consumer or post-consumer waste or a combination of the two. Pre-consumer waste is produced while items are being manufactured (such as the pieces of fabric leftover after cutting out a pattern) and post-consumer waste results from the finished product reaching the end of its useful life for the consumer (such as a T-shirt that doesn’t fit anymore).

"Manufacturers and designers in the mainstream fashion industry discard on average 15 percent of materials en route to production.” - EcoFashionTalk.com One Man’s Trash is Another Man’s Treasure

Benefits of upcycling

Upcycling stops adding stuff to a world that is already overwhelmed with material things. It also reuses materials that may otherwise end up in the landfill in creative and innovative ways - producing original often one-of-a-kind items from what many consider to be waste. It is a way for companies and designers to be more efficient with leftover materials such as upholstery scraps or vintage textiles and to give new life to worn-out jeans and tattered T-shirts.

"As we move into the '90s revival, grunge will be back, and upcycling will fit that look perfectly. I predict modern upcycling will actually look "upcycled," but with a much edgier feel.” - Orsola de Castro, Co-founder of Estethica, From Somewhere, and Reclaim to Wear; via Ecouterre’s 37 Eco-fashion Predictions for 2014

Whether as everyday apparel or runway exhibition pieces, upcycling can challenge cultural codes -- questioning what we consider to be trash versus fashion or beautiful versus ugly. For some it can also be a connection to our heritage -- incorporating vintage clothing or using a family heirloom to create an original piece preserving a bit of history.

Who is doing it?

The world of upcycling has exploded in the past few years, and there is a plethora of inspirational design in this facet of eco-fashion. An excellent summary of many designers throughout the world can be found in the newly released book "ReFashioned" by Sass Brown.

To see some great examples on the runway, Redress Raleigh’s annual Spring eco-fashion show often features innovative designers using upcycling in their collections. Mother/daughter team Zass Design creates gorgeous jewelry from overlooked materials. And Little Grey Line takes old men’s work shirts and remakes them into adorable dresses for little girls. This coming spring’s show will also feature a North Carolina State University student duo using denim remnants, a Durham-based designer creating chic handbags made from plastic bags, and another NCSU student showcasing how simple white T-shirts can become an elegant wedding dress.

In addition, a few companies are recognizing the combination of nostalgia and sentimentality many of us have about our clothing and seizing the opportunity to create memorable objects from apparel. Project Repat, based out of Boston, Mass., is one such example that creates quilts out of old T-shirts -- a great way to commemorate all your favorite concert gear without having a closet exploding with shirts that don’t fit anymore.

As consumers start realizing the devastating effects of fast fashion, they will begin looking for innovative ways to change their wardrobe. Upcycled apparel can be a part of this revolution -- helping people make meaningful choices with their clothing while appreciating the history of the industry.

Image courtesy of Redress via Facebook

Beth Stewart is the co-founder and Strategic Director of Redress, a company that connects and champions eco-conscious designers and companies through event planning and marketing. Stewart has a passion for catalyzing ethical and environmental consciousness within the fashion and textiles industry and looks forward to the day when people don’t brag about their fast fashion scores.