Distribution Network
Content
Proposals for government-brokered 'responsibility deals' committing
companies to CSR measures in return for a lighter regulatory regime are
being considered by the UK's Conservative Party.
An interim report from the party's responsible business working group suggests a Conservative government could create alliances between business and civil society to work on obesity and other issues. These would operate in a similar way to existing voluntary efforts such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, tackling a small number of core issues deemed by MPs as 'of deep and general concern'.
The participants would form a group to 'create and see through a shared solution to the problem' and to make 'commitments to change that would be binding'. In return, participating companies would be subject to a lighter regulatory burden.
However, lighter regulation would be available to all companies, not just those engaged in such 'responsibility deals', provided they were 'practising, leading-edge responsible business'. This could be based on participation in responsible business indices or by 'peer assessment', although the party says this area needs more discussion.
Its other new idea is 'social emissions trading', based on existing environmental emissions trading. High levels of fats, sugars and salts in processed foods could, for instance, be subject to 'emissions limits' and companies could trade surpluses. Or limits could be set on the alcohol content of drinks, and companies that lowered the amount of alcohol in their products could benefit financially from selling their 'alcohol quotas'.
So far most observers have suggested the ideas put forward by the working group would be too difficult to introduce, or even counterproductive. Janet Williamson, senior policy officer at the Trades Union Congress, told EP: 'The idea of companies taking part in such "deals" then being exempt from regulations is a dangerous one which, if implemented, could easily result in lower standards overall.'
Mark Goyder, director of the Tomorrow's Company think-tank, said the party should be congratulated for some 'fresh thinking', but added: 'I don't think it has yet come up with anything that would work.'
Deborah Doane, director of the CORE Coalition, which campaigns for more regulation on CSR, added: 'These ideas would be far more complex to administer than a regulatory approach which simply levels the playing field and enables companies to plan effectively.'
The party emphasizes the ideas are a 'basis for discussion' and are now out to consultation until the end of March, with final recommendations due in the summer. The working group consists of Jonathan Djanogly, shadow CSR minister; David Grayson, former managing director of Business in the Community; Peter Davis and Toby Webb of Ethical Corporation magazine; and Michael Hastings, global head of CSR at KPMG.
An interim report from the party's responsible business working group suggests a Conservative government could create alliances between business and civil society to work on obesity and other issues. These would operate in a similar way to existing voluntary efforts such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, tackling a small number of core issues deemed by MPs as 'of deep and general concern'.
The participants would form a group to 'create and see through a shared solution to the problem' and to make 'commitments to change that would be binding'. In return, participating companies would be subject to a lighter regulatory burden.
However, lighter regulation would be available to all companies, not just those engaged in such 'responsibility deals', provided they were 'practising, leading-edge responsible business'. This could be based on participation in responsible business indices or by 'peer assessment', although the party says this area needs more discussion.
Its other new idea is 'social emissions trading', based on existing environmental emissions trading. High levels of fats, sugars and salts in processed foods could, for instance, be subject to 'emissions limits' and companies could trade surpluses. Or limits could be set on the alcohol content of drinks, and companies that lowered the amount of alcohol in their products could benefit financially from selling their 'alcohol quotas'.
So far most observers have suggested the ideas put forward by the working group would be too difficult to introduce, or even counterproductive. Janet Williamson, senior policy officer at the Trades Union Congress, told EP: 'The idea of companies taking part in such "deals" then being exempt from regulations is a dangerous one which, if implemented, could easily result in lower standards overall.'
Mark Goyder, director of the Tomorrow's Company think-tank, said the party should be congratulated for some 'fresh thinking', but added: 'I don't think it has yet come up with anything that would work.'
Deborah Doane, director of the CORE Coalition, which campaigns for more regulation on CSR, added: 'These ideas would be far more complex to administer than a regulatory approach which simply levels the playing field and enables companies to plan effectively.'
The party emphasizes the ideas are a 'basis for discussion' and are now out to consultation until the end of March, with final recommendations due in the summer. The working group consists of Jonathan Djanogly, shadow CSR minister; David Grayson, former managing director of Business in the Community; Peter Davis and Toby Webb of Ethical Corporation magazine; and Michael Hastings, global head of CSR at KPMG.
Super Featured
No
Featured
No