Distribution Network
Content
A grouping of more than 20 Asian civil society groups has warned
against the wholesale ditching of draft UN guidelines on the conduct of
multinationals.
A sub-commission of the UN Commission on Human Rights drew up draft norms on human rights principles for multinationals two years ago, but they have been shelved after opposition from business groups and the US government.
John Ruggie, a Harvard professor and one of the main architects of the UN Global Compact, was appointed special UN representative to examine human rights and transnational corporations last year, and is seeking views on the future of the norms.
Now the civil society groups – who include Business Watch Indonesia, Korean Public Interest Lawyers Group and the Thailand-based Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development – has told Ruggie’s Asia regional consultation that the norms should not be scrapped. ‘It is essential that the UN norms, perhaps not in their current form, remain on the agenda of the UN,’ it said in a statement. ‘While we continue to strongly support the UN norms, we would also strongly support any other form of codification of the global standards with regard to transnational corporations and human rights.’
The statement advised Ruggie, who is to report with his conclusions next year, that he ‘should appreciate that some of the worst human rights abuses are being caused or abetted by multinationals throughout the Asia region in mining, oil and gas production, and the construction of large dams’.
So far Ruggie has intimated that he thinks the norms are not workable in their current form.
Other groups who supported the statement included the Alliance of Progressive Labour (Philippines), the Brotherhood of St Laurence (Australia), Civil Initiatives for Development and Peace (India), and the Human Rights Foundation of Monland (Burma).
A sub-commission of the UN Commission on Human Rights drew up draft norms on human rights principles for multinationals two years ago, but they have been shelved after opposition from business groups and the US government.
John Ruggie, a Harvard professor and one of the main architects of the UN Global Compact, was appointed special UN representative to examine human rights and transnational corporations last year, and is seeking views on the future of the norms.
Now the civil society groups – who include Business Watch Indonesia, Korean Public Interest Lawyers Group and the Thailand-based Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development – has told Ruggie’s Asia regional consultation that the norms should not be scrapped. ‘It is essential that the UN norms, perhaps not in their current form, remain on the agenda of the UN,’ it said in a statement. ‘While we continue to strongly support the UN norms, we would also strongly support any other form of codification of the global standards with regard to transnational corporations and human rights.’
The statement advised Ruggie, who is to report with his conclusions next year, that he ‘should appreciate that some of the worst human rights abuses are being caused or abetted by multinationals throughout the Asia region in mining, oil and gas production, and the construction of large dams’.
So far Ruggie has intimated that he thinks the norms are not workable in their current form.
Other groups who supported the statement included the Alliance of Progressive Labour (Philippines), the Brotherhood of St Laurence (Australia), Civil Initiatives for Development and Peace (India), and the Human Rights Foundation of Monland (Burma).
Super Featured
No
Featured
No