Distribution Network
Content
The recently agreed takeover of The Body Shop by French cosmetics
company L’Oreal has sparked fresh discussion about whether a
multinational can absorb a smaller company with an established
‘ethical’ name, and maintain that reputation.
The £652million ($1.1bn) takeover has provoked calls to boycott The Body Shop from campaigners concerned about L’Oreal’s animal testing record and a 26 per cent stake in it held by Nestlé, which has long been criticized over its marketing of breast milk substitutes.
Such deals have become increasingly common in the past five years, with Ben & Jerry’s taken over by Unilever, Stonyfield Farm by Groupe Danone, and Green & Black’s by Cadbury Schweppes. The Body Shop, which has more than 2000 shops in 53 countries, will continue as a stand-alone business with its own head office, and Dame Anita Roddick, its founder, will be retained as a consultant.
However, such assurances have failed to placate some campaigners, who now see The Body Shop as a target. The Ethical Consumer Research Group, which rates companies and publishes the results in Ethical Consumer magazine, said its score for The Body Shop will fall from 11 out of 20 to 2.5, mainly because of L’Oreal’s animal testing and the Nestlé shareholding, but also because it believes L’Oreal does not have strong ethical policies in general. Baby Milk Action, which co-ordinates international consumer action against Nestlé, has added The Body Shop to its boycott list, as have other groups.
However, some feel the boycott calls are counterproductive. ‘Punishing a social enterprise’s effort to mainstream ethical consumerism would be to cut off our nose to spite our face,’ said Samantha Huddle, general manager of Great Place to Work Institute UK. Giuliano Perseu, of the Human Rights Institute at the Central American University in Nicaragua, said: ‘We should be happy mainstream companies buy other companies well-known for their ethical practices. It’s a sign that something is changing for the better. This fundamentalist approach does not lead to anything good.’
ECRG director Rob Harrison conceded that ‘campaigners are divided’ on how to respond when companies that have built up an ethical reputation are taken over, but said boycotts were a useful tool. L’Oreal is not regarded as being in the vanguard of socially and environmentally responsible businesses, but in 2004 German rating agency oekom ranked it third in its sector, behind Henkel and Procter & Gamble. SRI research firm Siri Company said L’Oreal ‘performs quite well’ on sustainability.
L’Oreal is in the middle rank of large French companies in terms of disclosing details of its social and environmental performance, according to the Alpha Etudes consultancy (see page six).
In a related development, Colgate Palmolive is buying the US maker of ‘natural’ toothpastes Tom’s of Maine for $100m (£57m). Co-founders Tom and Kate Chappell say they have an undertaking from Colgate to preserve the company’s ‘character, spirit, and values’ and to continue an existing policy of returning 10 per cent of pre-tax profits to the community.
The £652million ($1.1bn) takeover has provoked calls to boycott The Body Shop from campaigners concerned about L’Oreal’s animal testing record and a 26 per cent stake in it held by Nestlé, which has long been criticized over its marketing of breast milk substitutes.
Such deals have become increasingly common in the past five years, with Ben & Jerry’s taken over by Unilever, Stonyfield Farm by Groupe Danone, and Green & Black’s by Cadbury Schweppes. The Body Shop, which has more than 2000 shops in 53 countries, will continue as a stand-alone business with its own head office, and Dame Anita Roddick, its founder, will be retained as a consultant.
However, such assurances have failed to placate some campaigners, who now see The Body Shop as a target. The Ethical Consumer Research Group, which rates companies and publishes the results in Ethical Consumer magazine, said its score for The Body Shop will fall from 11 out of 20 to 2.5, mainly because of L’Oreal’s animal testing and the Nestlé shareholding, but also because it believes L’Oreal does not have strong ethical policies in general. Baby Milk Action, which co-ordinates international consumer action against Nestlé, has added The Body Shop to its boycott list, as have other groups.
However, some feel the boycott calls are counterproductive. ‘Punishing a social enterprise’s effort to mainstream ethical consumerism would be to cut off our nose to spite our face,’ said Samantha Huddle, general manager of Great Place to Work Institute UK. Giuliano Perseu, of the Human Rights Institute at the Central American University in Nicaragua, said: ‘We should be happy mainstream companies buy other companies well-known for their ethical practices. It’s a sign that something is changing for the better. This fundamentalist approach does not lead to anything good.’
ECRG director Rob Harrison conceded that ‘campaigners are divided’ on how to respond when companies that have built up an ethical reputation are taken over, but said boycotts were a useful tool. L’Oreal is not regarded as being in the vanguard of socially and environmentally responsible businesses, but in 2004 German rating agency oekom ranked it third in its sector, behind Henkel and Procter & Gamble. SRI research firm Siri Company said L’Oreal ‘performs quite well’ on sustainability.
L’Oreal is in the middle rank of large French companies in terms of disclosing details of its social and environmental performance, according to the Alpha Etudes consultancy (see page six).
In a related development, Colgate Palmolive is buying the US maker of ‘natural’ toothpastes Tom’s of Maine for $100m (£57m). Co-founders Tom and Kate Chappell say they have an undertaking from Colgate to preserve the company’s ‘character, spirit, and values’ and to continue an existing policy of returning 10 per cent of pre-tax profits to the community.
Super Featured
No
Featured
No